ArticleScientific reports2026
An intelligent IoT-machine learning framework for wildfire detection and prediction using a hybrid RF-XGB model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forest fires in Turkey have received comparatively limited scholarly attention despite the country's high seasonal susceptibility, particularly during summer due to adverse climatic conditions. For real-time detection and risk assessment, this research suggests an integrated intelligent wildfire monitoring and prediction framework that integrates a unique weighted-voting RF-XGB hybrid model with Internet of Things (IoT)-based wireless sensor networks (WSNs). The adaptive weighting approach, which goes beyond traditional majority-voting ensembles, combines Random Forest and Extreme Gradient Boosting to take use of complementary variance-reduction and boosting processes. This is the methodological innovation. A multi-season Turkish forest fire dataset that included environmental sensor data, including temperature, relative humidity, and carbon monoxide concentration, was used to train the model. Distribution-preserving sampling and stratified k-fold cross-validation were used to alleviate class imbalance. With an accuracy of 0.9631, F1-score of 0.9627, and ROC-AUC of 0.994, the suggested hybrid model outperforms the others when compared to RF, XGBoost, KNN, Decision Tree, MLR, SVM, and ANN. Larger improvements were shown over KNN (10.4%) and Decision Tree (18.3%), while Relative Improvement (RI), as determined by the AUC measure, reveals a 4.6% increase over XGBoost and 5.7% over Random Forest-the strongest baselines. When compared to MLR, SVM, and ANN, improvements of over 50% were seen, demonstrating the hybrid model's greater robustness and discriminating capabilities. At the system level, a lightweight Multiple Logistic Regression (MLR) model was deployed on Arduino Nano-based sensor nodes to enable edge-level probability estimation and reduce communication overhead. Nodes operate using hourly duty cycling and transmit only when fire probability exceeds a predefined threshold, achieving an analytically estimated lifetime of up to 11 months. The framework was implemented in Zeytinpark using 80 sensor nodes deployed via hybrid grid and K-means clustering, achieving 95.58% coverage. Real-time detections are verified at the sink node using the RF-XGB model before triggering multi-level alerts, including local alarms, cloud updates, Telegram notifications, and mobile-based fire localization. The results demonstrate that the proposed contribution lies in the adaptive hybrid ensemble design, hierarchical edge-cloud intelligence distribution, and validated real-world deployment. The framework provides a robust, energy-efficient, and scalable solution for rapid wildfire detection and forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.