Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A fuzzy logic and blockchain-enhanced framework for secure, explainable eHealth in Society 5.0.

Dileep Kumar Murala, Kumar Babu Batta, K Madhura, Veera Ankalu Vuyyuru, Bananeza Romeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dileep Kumar MuralaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (ICFAI Tech), ICFAI Foundation for Higher Education, Hyderabad, Telangana, 501203, India.
Kumar Babu BattaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Technology, GITAM (Deemed to be University), Hyderabad, Telangana, 502329, India.
K MadhuraManipal Institute of Technology Bengaluru, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 560063, India.
Veera Ankalu VuyyuruDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vaddeswaram, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, 520002, India.
Bananeza RomeoClinical medicine and community health, University of Rwanda, P.O.BOX 4285, Kigali, Rwanda. bananeza777@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The constraints of current intelligent healthcare systems are extensively addressed in this study, which offers a thorough framework for expanding eHealth within the human-centered paradigm of Society 5.0. Reliance on centralised cloud systems, which have delay for real-time IoMT data, single points of failure, and serious data privacy/security threats, are some of the disadvantages of current approaches. Traditional healthcare AI models are often black-boxes, lacking explainability and transparency (XAI), which are necessary for patient acceptance and physician trust. To overcome these issues, the Proposed Approach uses a novel combination of specialised technologies and a multi-tiered architecture of cloud services, edge computing, and IoMT. The Health Prediction using Cloud Edge 2.0 (HPCE 2.0) algorithm employs fuzzy logic to combine static Electronic Health Records (EHRs) with dynamic real-time IoMT data to handle medical input uncertainty and imprecision. This algorithm predicts health severity accurately and individually. Proof of Authentication 2.0 (PoAh 2.0) consensus ensures data integrity and non-repudiation in the blockchain-enhanced architecture's immutable, decentralised ledger. By adding XAI (LIME/SHAP) to give local and alternative answers, the system stops being a black box and becomes an open collaborator. Edge-cloud integration improves performance by lowering delay for important real-time alerts. Security tests show that the PoAh 2.0 system works well and can be expanded by quickly building and verifying blocks. This makes sure that strict privacy rules are followed while keeping the good predictive performance of a cardiac arrest prediction case study. This platform sets a new standard for interpretable, safe, and responsive AI-driven healthcare.

Indexed as

BlockchainComputer SecurityFuzzy LogicTelemedicineAlgorithmsCloud ComputingDigital HealthElectronic Health RecordsHumansBlockchainEdge computingeHealthExplainable AI (XAI)Fuzzy logicHealth predictionIoMT (internet of medical things)PoAh 2.0Society 5.0

Identifiers

PMID42129248
PMCPMC13365468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.