ArticleScientific reports2026
MultiDentNet: a unified deep learning framework for multi-class dental condition screening and preliminary oral lesion triage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and evaluate MultiDentNet, a unified deep learning framework for multi-class dental condition screening and preliminary risk stratification of cancer-suspicious oral lesions, utilizing backbone-diverse ensembling and inter-class relational modeling. Four complementary CNN backbones (DenseNet-121, EfficientNetV2-S, ResNet-50, Inception-V3) integrated with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) attention, graph convolutional networks (GCNs), and multi-task learning were fused via validation-optimized weighting. The framework was evaluated on 10,235 clinical intraoral images (five conditions) and 940 clinically labeled oral lesion images (cancer-suspicious vs. non-cancer-suspicious; histopathological confirmation unavailable). Performance was assessed using accuracy, Cohen's κ, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), false negative rate (FNR), and bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (CIs), alongside simulated domain-shift robustness testing. The ensemble achieved 99.70% accuracy (95% CI 99.32-100.00%) for dental classification ([Formula: see text]) and 95.71% (95% CI 92.20-98.58%) for oral lesion risk stratification ([Formula: see text]). For cancer-suspicious lesions, recall reached 97.31% (FNR: 2.69%, 95% CI 0.00-7.15%). Architectural diversity successfully mitigated class imbalance, significantly reducing the Hypodontia FNR to 1.65% (95% CI 0.00-4.24%) compared to single-model baselines. Performance demonstrated moderate resilience to acquisition variability (Δaccuracy ≈ 8-12% degradation under brightness and contrast perturbations) but degraded substantially under high-frequency noise. Grad-CAM visualizations localized attention to clinically relevant morphological features. MultiDentNet provides an interpretable, efficient baseline for dental screening and lesion triage. Serving as an adjunctive proof-of-concept, its metrics reflect an upper bound due to reliance on single-center, clinically labeled data. Prospective multi-center validation with histopathological standards remains necessary. Code: https://github.com/Aliyar4061/MultiDentNetV3 . Positioned as an adjunctive triage tool for resource-constrained settings, high-volume workflows, and tele-dentistry, designed to augment clinician-in-the-loop oversight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.