Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129236›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Faculty perceptions of AI for personalized instruction and learning facilitation in higher education.

Samad Saki, Hassanreza Zeinabadi, Hossein Abbasian, Bijan Abdollahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samad SakiDepartment of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Hassanreza ZeinabadiDepartment of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran. zeinabadi_hr@khu.ac.ir.
Hossein AbbasianDepartment of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Bijan AbdollahiDepartment of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines university faculty members' perceptions of how artificial intelligence (AI) supports personalized instruction and facilitates learning opportunities in higher education. Given the exploratory nature of AI-based pedagogical practices, a qualitative, interpretive design was employed to capture instructors' lived experiences and meaning-making processes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 faculty members from two Iranian universities, selected through purposive maximum-variation sampling. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis in MAXQDA 22, and trustworthiness was strengthened through double-coding (Cohen's κ = 0.82), member checking, expert review, and an audit trail. Two overarching themes emerged: (1) personalized course content and (2) facilitation of learning opportunities. Faculty perceived AI as capable of diagnosing learner profiles, adapting instructional materials, generating individualized feedback, and supporting self-paced and competency-based learning pathways. They also viewed AI as a facilitator that enhances access to resources, strengthens interaction and collaboration, and enables predictive academic guidance. Importantly, these findings represent instructors' perceptions rather than empirically verified learning outcomes. Participants emphasized the need for ethical governance, content accuracy, and institutional readiness, highlighting mechanisms such as Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to ensure reliable AI outputs. Overall, the study provides a contextualized understanding of AI as a multifaceted pedagogical partner in higher education and identifies the conditions necessary for its responsible and effective integration into teaching and learning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceFacultyLearningAcademiaAdultFemaleHumansIranMalePerceptionTeachingUniversitiesAdaptive instructionArtificial intelligenceFaculty perceptionsHigher educationLearning facilitationPersonalized learning

Identifiers

PMID42129236
PMCPMC13365449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.