Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129213›Full record

Trial reportNature communications2026

Personalized machine learning-guided radiation dose escalation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prospective pilot study.

Hamed Akbari, Suyash Mohan, Fang Liu, Cecilia Jiang, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Melanie Berger, Saima Rathore, Michel Bilello, Chiharu Sako, Jose Garcia and 21 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03477513 (Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma Via Image-Guided Predictive Modeling of Recurrence), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03477513 nacompletednot on this map

Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma Via Image-Guided Predictive Modeling of Recurrence: A Single-Arm, Single Institutional Pilot Prospective Study of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorAbramson Cancer Center at Penn MedicineRan2018 to 2026Enrolled23ConditionsGlioblastomaArmsRadation Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Hamed AkbariDepartment of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9786-3707
Suyash MohanCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-115X
Fang LiuPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2922-4414
Cecilia JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anahita Fathi KazerooniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Melanie BergerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8679-6391
Saima RathoreDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4752-2298
Michel BilelloCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Chiharu SakoCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3243-3954
Jose GarciaCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-2703-0777
Steven BremDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5803-8920
Spyridon BakasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-6482
Elizabeth MamourianCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-4887
Abigail PepinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paul JamesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jay DorseyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ashish SinghCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-3636
Drew ParkerCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ragini VermaCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Quy CaoPenn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stephen J BagleyGBM Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Arati DesaiGBM Translational Center of Excellence, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Donald M O'RourkeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8479-7314
Russell T ShinoharaCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
MacLean P NasrallahCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4861-0898
Boon-Keng Kevin TeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Goldie KurtzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gaurav ShuklaCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michelle Alonso-BasantaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robert A LustigDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Robert.Lustig@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0633-3802
Christos DavatzikosCenter for Data Science and AI for Integrated Diagnostics (AI2D), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Christos.davatzikos@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-8561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor with near-universal recurrence despite maximal safe resection followed by standard chemoradiation. We conducted a prospective pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03477513) with predefined endpoints and structured dose-escalation criteria to evaluate the feasibility and safety of personalized precision radiation therapy (PPRT) guided by machine learning (ML)-based maps of tumor infiltration. Twenty patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma who underwent gross total resection received PPRT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. The primary outcomes were median progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary outcomes included patterns of recurrence, rate of clinically significant toxicity, and median overall survival (OS). PPRT was feasible and well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 acute adverse events; 47% experienced grade 1 and 53% grade 2 events. Following therapy, radiation necrosis occurred in 47% of PPRT-temozolomide patients versus 12% in standard-of-care patients (p < 0.001). Median PFS was 24.4 months versus 11.6 months in 68 propensity score matched (PSM) historical control group (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.61; p = 0.001). Median OS was 35.4 versus 17.7 months (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.69; p = 0.003). Exploratory post hoc comparison suggests improved survival, but these findings are preliminary and require validation in randomized trials.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaMachine LearningPrecision MedicineAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID42129213
PMCPMC13377092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.