Trial reportNature communications2026
Personalized machine learning-guided radiation dose escalation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: prospective pilot study.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03477513 (Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma Via Image-Guided Predictive Modeling of Recurrence), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Treatment of Glioblastoma Via Image-Guided Predictive Modeling of Recurrence: A Single-Arm, Single Institutional Pilot Prospective Study of Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- White matter pathlength maps from diffusion-weighted MRI tractography for radiotherapy target planning in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in oncology: linking biological discovery to clinical utility.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary brain tumor with near-universal recurrence despite maximal safe resection followed by standard chemoradiation. We conducted a prospective pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03477513) with predefined endpoints and structured dose-escalation criteria to evaluate the feasibility and safety of personalized precision radiation therapy (PPRT) guided by machine learning (ML)-based maps of tumor infiltration. Twenty patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma who underwent gross total resection received PPRT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. The primary outcomes were median progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Secondary outcomes included patterns of recurrence, rate of clinically significant toxicity, and median overall survival (OS). PPRT was feasible and well tolerated, with no grade ≥3 acute adverse events; 47% experienced grade 1 and 53% grade 2 events. Following therapy, radiation necrosis occurred in 47% of PPRT-temozolomide patients versus 12% in standard-of-care patients (p < 0.001). Median PFS was 24.4 months versus 11.6 months in 68 propensity score matched (PSM) historical control group (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.61; p = 0.001). Median OS was 35.4 versus 17.7 months (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.69; p = 0.003). Exploratory post hoc comparison suggests improved survival, but these findings are preliminary and require validation in randomized trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.