ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Application of escitalopram population pharmacokinetic repository: a step to precision dosing.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Escitalopram is widely used to treat major depressive disorder, yet drug exposure varies substantially across patients, causing the inadequate response or toxicity probability. Individualized dosing supported by therapeutic drug monitoring and published population pharmacokinetic models is promising, but independent evaluation of existing models and clinically usable decision-support tools remains limited. We systematically reviewed published population pharmacokinetic models for escitalopram and extracted key patient characteristics and model parameters. The models were evaluated in an independent real-world dataset from Chinese psychiatric patients using simulation-based or prediction-based metrics. The best-performing model was implemented in a web-based clinical decision-support tool. Ten published models were identified and evaluated using data from 309 Chinese patients, contributing 421 plasma concentrations. A priori predictions consistently underestimated observed concentrations, with median absolute prediction errors ranging from 37.97-64.62%. In contrast, Bayesian updating using TDM data markedly improved both accuracy and precision, reducing most of median absolute prediction errors to <30%. The best-performing model was implemented in an openly accessible Shiny application to support initial dose selection, TDM-guided dose individualization, and management of missed or delayed doses with remedial dosing recommendations ( https://escitalopram-liux-v1.shinyapps.io/Escitalopram_MIPD_Tool/ ). This study provides a comprehensive external evaluation of escitalopram population pharmacokinetic models in a Chinese psychiatric cohort and presents a freely accessible, clinically oriented precision dosing tool to support individualized escitalopram therapy for Chinese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.