Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129140›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026

Application of escitalopram population pharmacokinetic repository: a step to precision dosing.

Li Liu, Jinhong Chen, Gehang Ju, Cheng Qian, Xi Xie, Huiping Song, Yang Gong, Yinli Luo, Wei Nie, Dongsheng Ouyang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Li Liu *The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China.
Jinhong Chen *The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China.
Gehang JuInstitute of Big Data, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, PR China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-5296
Cheng QianDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xi XieHunan Prevention and Treatment Institute for Occupational Diseases, Affiliated to the University of South China, Changsha, China.
Huiping SongDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yang GongThe Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China.
Yinli LuoThe Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China.
Wei NieThe Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province (Brain Hospital of Hunan Province), Changsha, China.
Dongsheng OuyangInstitute of Big Data, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, PR China.
Lulu ChenHunan Key Laboratory for Bioanalysis of Complex Matrix Samples, Changsha Duxact Biotech Co., Ltd., Changsha, China.
Junlan LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. xiaozhu@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-619X
Xin LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Administration, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. liux24@m.fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5595-3195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escitalopram is widely used to treat major depressive disorder, yet drug exposure varies substantially across patients, causing the inadequate response or toxicity probability. Individualized dosing supported by therapeutic drug monitoring and published population pharmacokinetic models is promising, but independent evaluation of existing models and clinically usable decision-support tools remains limited. We systematically reviewed published population pharmacokinetic models for escitalopram and extracted key patient characteristics and model parameters. The models were evaluated in an independent real-world dataset from Chinese psychiatric patients using simulation-based or prediction-based metrics. The best-performing model was implemented in a web-based clinical decision-support tool. Ten published models were identified and evaluated using data from 309 Chinese patients, contributing 421 plasma concentrations. A priori predictions consistently underestimated observed concentrations, with median absolute prediction errors ranging from 37.97-64.62%. In contrast, Bayesian updating using TDM data markedly improved both accuracy and precision, reducing most of median absolute prediction errors to <30%. The best-performing model was implemented in an openly accessible Shiny application to support initial dose selection, TDM-guided dose individualization, and management of missed or delayed doses with remedial dosing recommendations ( https://escitalopram-liux-v1.shinyapps.io/Escitalopram_MIPD_Tool/ ). This study provides a comprehensive external evaluation of escitalopram population pharmacokinetic models in a Chinese psychiatric cohort and presents a freely accessible, clinically oriented precision dosing tool to support individualized escitalopram therapy for Chinese patients.

Indexed as

Antidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCitalopramEscitalopramMajor Depressive DisorderModels, BiologicalPrecision MedicineSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsAdultBayes TheoremChinaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntidepressive Agents, Second-GenerationCitalopramEscitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42129140
PMCPMC13342514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.