ArticleCell discovery2026
Decoding the role of chromatin context in the off-target effects of CRISPR gene editing with EGOLD.
Article in Cell discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the power of CRISPR in genome editing, its clinical application is limited by off-target effects; these effects are currently difficult to evaluate at the genome level but are likely to involve chromatin context. Here, we developed the Endogenous Genome-wide Off-target Library Detection (EGOLD) method for high-throughput detection of off-target effects and identification of chromatin context bias in gene editor evaluation. Applying EGOLD to define the off-target characteristics of 17 base-editing tools revealed 2,145,592 total off-targets, with 1236-618,774 events detected per tool. The frequency of off-targets of CRISPR/Cas9 and derivative base editors ranged from 40% to 80% and were strongly influenced by the chromatin context. Using a large-scale endogenous off-target dataset with strict target site conditions to exclude the influence of sequence context, we found that off-target effects occurred in open chromatin genomic regions at a significantly greater frequency than in closed chromatin regions. The incorporation of EGOLD-Seq off-target chromatin context data to train machine learning-based models of gene editor activity substantially improved off-target prediction accuracy. These findings and the accompanying toolkit can guide mechanistic research and the development of safe and precise CRISPR-based tools.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.