ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Patterns of medical intermediate care unit use in critically ill very old patients in France.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe growing population of adults aged ≥ 80 represents major challenges for critical care. Intermediate care units (IMCUs) offer a level that could bridge the gap between ICU and standard ward, but information is lacking regarding IMCU use for older critically ill patients. This study aimed to characterize critical-care trajectories involving IMCU use among older critically ill patients at a national level.
methodsA nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted in France, including all patients hospitalized in medical critical care in 2018. Patients were categorized as young (18-64), old (65-79), and very old adults (≥ 80). Trajectories between critical care units and general wards were visualized using Sankey diagrams. Overall survival was represented with Kaplan-Meier curves according to trajectory patterns.
resultsOf 439,213 individuals admitted to medical critical care, 28.2% were aged ≥ 80. Among patients aged ≥ 80 admitted to an ICU, a step-up strategy (IMCU before ICU) was used in 12% of patients, and a step-down strategy (ICU followed by IMCU) in 23%. The step-up strategy was associated with high mortality in critical care (46.6%, compared to 33.9% for patients admitted directly to an ICU). Step-down patients had an extended critical care length of stay; however, those discharged from critical care via step-down strategy showed a lower cumulative mortality at one year (RR 0.86).
conclusionIMCUs play a central role in the management of very old critically ill patients. The potential benefit of IMCU care for older adults transitioning out of the ICU should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.