ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Age-of-acquisition affects object recognition and compound word identification: Evidence from visual duration thresholds and progressive demasking.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Items acquired during childhood are processed more quickly and accurately than those acquired during adulthood, a phenomenon known as the age of acquisition (AoA) effect. One explanation is that the AoA effect results from the arbitrary nature of the input-output mapping during the development of a lexical-semantic representation. However, previous behavioural studies have not directly compared the AoA effects in pictures and word processing. To investigate this, 48 British English students completed a visual duration threshold task and four variations of progressive demasking experiments. In these tasks, participants were shown 150 compound words, either unspaced or spaced, while attempting to identify the modifier, head, or the full compound word. In addition, in Experiment 4, we used a visual duration threshold task (VDT) for 150 objects that represented 150 compound words to assess the mapping theory. We observed that early-acquired items were identified more quickly than late-acquired items across all tasks, including the VDT. The AoA effect was strongest for a progressive demasking task (PDT) with unspaced and spaced compound words, followed by the VDT for pictures and PDT with component identification for spaced compound words. The only exception was the PDT with component identification of unspaced compound words, where the effect was not present. These results align with the integrated account, as the AoA effect is rooted in semantic representation during word identification but is also influenced by the connection between perception and semantics in the VDT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.