Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42129005›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

Addressing contaminants of emerging concern in the United States public water systems.

Tasha Siame, Angelique B Willis, Albert Junior Nyarko, Shno Karimi, Esther Tonade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tasha SiameForestry Department, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. siametas@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7890-7645
Angelique B WillisEnvironmental Science and Policy Program, College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-3805
Albert Junior NyarkoDepartment of Communication, College of Communication and Information, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7422-1170
Shno KarimiEnvironmental Science and Policy Program, College of Social Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Esther TonadeForestry Department, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2498-7918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) represent a growing yet inadequately governed threat to drinking water safety in the USA. Advances in analytical technologies have detected widespread, low-level contamination from substances like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and personal care products. This raises concerns about the long-term health of humans and ecosystems. Despite growing scientific knowledge, regulatory and policy frameworks have lagged, leading to uneven protections across public water systems. Here, we assess the policy and regulatory infrastructure related to CECs nationwide across all 50 states. Only four states (8%), California, Maine, Wisconsin, and Vermont, had strong, multi-CEC policy infrastructure with enforceable standards, systematic monitoring, and investments in advanced treatment. Many states (36; 72%), distributed across regions, exhibited moderate capacity, typically focusing on PFAS rather than on comprehensive CEC management. In contrast, ten states (20%), mainly in the South and rural West, exhibited poor policy infrastructure with limited regulation, technology, and weak enforcement. These disparities reveal substantial geographic and institutional gaps in drinking water governance. By comparing US and international policies, we propose phased, practical recommendations that combine precautionary regulation, polluter accountability, innovation incentives, and transparency. These steps aim to update drinking water governance to match current chemical challenges, safeguard vulnerable communities, and prepare US water systems for an expanding list of emerging contaminants.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PolicyUnited StatesWater SupplyDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalContaminants of emerging concernPolicyUS drinking water regulation

Identifiers

PMID42129005
PMCPMC13226431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.