ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Addressing contaminants of emerging concern in the United States public water systems.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) represent a growing yet inadequately governed threat to drinking water safety in the USA. Advances in analytical technologies have detected widespread, low-level contamination from substances like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and personal care products. This raises concerns about the long-term health of humans and ecosystems. Despite growing scientific knowledge, regulatory and policy frameworks have lagged, leading to uneven protections across public water systems. Here, we assess the policy and regulatory infrastructure related to CECs nationwide across all 50 states. Only four states (8%), California, Maine, Wisconsin, and Vermont, had strong, multi-CEC policy infrastructure with enforceable standards, systematic monitoring, and investments in advanced treatment. Many states (36; 72%), distributed across regions, exhibited moderate capacity, typically focusing on PFAS rather than on comprehensive CEC management. In contrast, ten states (20%), mainly in the South and rural West, exhibited poor policy infrastructure with limited regulation, technology, and weak enforcement. These disparities reveal substantial geographic and institutional gaps in drinking water governance. By comparing US and international policies, we propose phased, practical recommendations that combine precautionary regulation, polluter accountability, innovation incentives, and transparency. These steps aim to update drinking water governance to match current chemical challenges, safeguard vulnerable communities, and prepare US water systems for an expanding list of emerging contaminants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.