ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Evaluating upper airway in orthodontics via 3D UX-Net model on CBCT scans.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsThe relationship between orthodontic treatment and upper airway morphology is increasingly recognized. Artificial intelligence (AI) now supports airway analysis, but traditional 3D U-Net models show limited accuracy, particularly in the laryngopharynx. This study proposes a deep learning model to accurately and efficiently extract 3D upper airway structures from CBCT scans, facilitating improved orthodontic monitoring.
methodsThe 3D UX-Net was employed for airway segmentation. Biased pharyngeal interface information from the network output enabled precise localization of boundary landmarks on the midsagittal plane, enhancing interface delineation.
resultsOn internal 5-fold cross-validation, 3D UX-Net achieved a mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.953 ± 0.007 for total airway segmentation, outperforming existing methods. External validation across three geographic datasets confirmed strong generalization. After refining the pharyngeal interface via midsagittal landmarks, mean DSC improved to 0.963 ± 0.006.
conclusionThe proposed model enables high-precision upper airway segmentation, supporting more efficient and comprehensive clinical image analysis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study addresses the insufficient segmentation accuracy of prior 3D U-Net models, especially in the laryngeal region, offering enhanced reliability for orthodontic airway assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42128967What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.