ArticleParasitology research2026
Detection of haemoparasites in selected Australian reptiles using archived blood smears.
Article in Parasitology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Haemoparasites of Australian reptiles remain poorly documented, with much of the available knowledge derived from studies conducted several decades ago. Using archived blood smears, this study examined the occurrence, morphology, and host associations of haemoprotozoans in two gecko species (Gehyra dubia and Hemidactylus frenatus), two freshwater turtle species (Emydura macquarii krefftii and Muchelys latisternum), and an associated turtle leech (Placobdelloides bancrofti) from northern Queensland, Australia. A total of 332 gecko blood smears were examined, with no blood parasites detected, suggesting that infections were absent, rare, or below the detection threshold at the time of sampling. In contrast, protistan parasites were detected in 93% of 15 freshwater turtles examined, with high prevalence of both haemogregarines and trypanosomes and frequent co-infections. Morphological characteristics and developmental stages of haemogregarines were consistent with the genus Haemogregarina, and similar with Haemogregarina clelandi, representing a new geographic record. Trypanosome infections occurred as multiple trypomastigote morphotypes consistent with previous descriptions of Trypanosoma chelodinae and related forms. All 38 leech crop smears examined were positive for Trypanosoma spp., predominantly at the epimastigote stage, supporting the role of P. bancrofti as a vector of turtle trypanosomes in Australian freshwater systems. This study highlights marked contrasts in haemoprotozoan occurrence between terrestrial and aquatic reptiles, reinforces the importance of leeches in turtle parasite transmission, and demonstrates the value of archived blood smears for establishing historical baselines and addressing knowledge gaps in Australian reptile parasitology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.