Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42128945›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2026

Development and validation of a deep learning model for liver shear stiffness regression using abdominal multiparametric MRI across multiple sites and vendors.

Redha Ali, Hailong Li, Scott B Reeder, David Harris, William Masch, Anum Aslam, Krishna P Shanbhogue, Nehal A Parikh, Lili He, Jonathan R Dillman

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Redha AliImaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Hailong LiImaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Scott B ReederDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
David HarrisDepartment of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
William MaschDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anum AslamDepartment of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Krishna P ShanbhogueDepartment of Radiology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Nehal A ParikhNeurodevelopmental Disorders Prevention Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Lili HeImaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jonathan R DillmanImaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA. jonathan.dillman@cchmc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-0164

Funding

NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB029944NIBIB NIH HHS R01-EB030582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLiver stiffness measurement is important for assessing chronic liver disease (CLD). MR elastography (MRE) requires specialized hardware and expertise. Non-invasive deep learning (DL) models using multiparametric abdominal MRI may provide an accessible alternative. We sought to develop and validate a DL model for predicting continuous liver shear stiffness from non-contrast multiparametric abdominal MRI and electronic health record (EHR) data across multiple sites and vendors. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a retrospective, multi-institutional study. We analyzed 3680 abdominal MRI examinations from 3376 patients with confirmed or suspected CLD. Non-contrast T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with EHR data were used as inputs. MRE-derived liver shear stiffness served as the reference. A transformer-based multi-channel DL model was trained using multi-site 10-fold cross-validation and evaluated on temporally held-out internal (n = 1224) and independent external (n = 365) test sets. Performance was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r); residual analysis assessed bias.

resultsIn cross-validation, the model achieved an r of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.80). On the internal test set, r was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.80), and on the external set, r was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.83). The model showed no significant bias based on age, sex, or BMI (p > 0.05). In patients with and without steatotic liver disease, r was 0.74 and 0.76, respectively.

conclusionOur transformer-based multi-channel model predicts continuous liver shear stiffness from routinely acquired multiparametric MRI and EHR data with moderate correlation to MRE, representing a potential step toward accessible, non-invasive liver stiffness estimation. KEY POINTS: Question Can routinely acquired multiparametric abdominal MRI and electronic health record data predict liver stiffness across multiple sites and scanner vendors using a deep learning approach? Findings The optimized deep learning model predicted liver stiffness with r = 0.78 in cross-validation and r = 0.76 in external validation using multiparametric MRI and electronic health record data. Clinical relevance This study introduces a preliminary yet robust AI method to estimate liver stiffness from routine multiparametric MRI and EHR data, offering a scalable fibrosis assessment approach suitable for opportunistic evaluation and as a complementary tool when MRE is unavailable.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElasticity Imaging TechniquesLiverLiver DiseasesMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesDeep learningLiver diseases, ChronicLiver stiffnessMagnetic resonance elastographyMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42128945
PMCPMC13341901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.