ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
From animal models to NAMs: a paradigm shift in developmental immunotoxicity testing.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- HIDmap: a physiology-based map of human immune system development to support animal-free research and regulatory innovation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental immunotoxicology (DIT) is emerging as a critical area in regulatory toxicology, driven by the recognition that the developing immune system is particularly vulnerable to xenobiotic exposure. Disruptions occurring during fetal or early postnatal life may result in long-lasting alterations in immune competence, tolerance, and disease susceptibility. This review provides a comprehensive overview of immune system development, highlighting key developmental stages from embryogenesis to postnatal maturation and identifying windows of heightened immune system sensitivity to toxicants. By integrating mechanistic insights and methodological advances, this review aims to support the improvement and extension of DIT testing frameworks and the development of predictive tools for regulatory and research applications. Recent advances in New Approach Methodologies offer promising alternatives for modeling human immune ontogeny, while highlighting the challenge of ensuring adequate coverage of critical developmental mechanisms and windows of susceptibility relevant to immunotoxicity. The integration of physiological maps and multi-omics technologies enhances mechanistic understanding, while epidemiological associations between exposures and functional endpoints underscore the real-world relevance of DIT and can identify biomarkers to guide the further development of relevant and sensitive models. Despite these advances, challenges remain, including the scarcity of human reference data, the lack of standardized protocols, and the need for validated test batteries covering diverse mechanisms once the tests have been refined. Addressing these gaps is essential to support the regulatory uptake of DIT data and to advance predictive, mechanistically anchored, and ethically sound strategies for DIT testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.