ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Contribution of dermal ethanol absorption during laboratory-controlled high-frequency use of alcohol-based hand rubs followed by glove use.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The safety of using ethanol-based products for hygienic hand disinfection in healthcare workers is controlled by restricting air levels. This raises the question of whether these workers are sufficiently protected against potential dermal absorption. The study aim was to determine the contribution of the dermal route to the total uptake of ethanol. A laboratory-controlled study of 25 sequential alcohol-based-hand-rubs (ABHRs) with subsequent intermediate glove use was conducted in seven healthcare workers. Two exposure conditions were compared: hands and forearms placed inside a laboratory fume hood preventing inhalation (skin-only condition) and the same procedure but outside the fume hood to allow inhalation (native condition). The hand hygiene product contained 84% ethanol and 1% ethanol-d6 added to verify exogenous origin. Inhalation exposure was measured by personal air sampling. Blood was collected at baseline, during exposure and a post-exposure wash-out period and analysed for ethanol and ethanol-d6 by HS-GC-MS. The contribution of dermal uptake was assessed by comparing the area-under-curve (AUC) of blood ethanol concentrations in the skin-only condition with that in the native condition within each study participant. Inhalation exposure in the breathing zone was (mean ± sd): 5.3 ± 3.6 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.