ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
Ferrofluid microrobot driven by an adjustable magnetic tweezer for soft tissue mechanical measurement.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative mapping of tissue mechanical properties is essential for understanding disease progression and guiding therapeutic interventions. However, conventional techniques are constrained by limited spatial coverage and poor mechanical compliance between rigid probes and soft biological tissues. Here, we report an adjustable magnetic tweezer microsystem that actuates a 1 mm vegetable oil-based ferrofluid droplet for in situ mechanical measurement with high spatial coverage and accuracy. The system features a tunable workspace (9-80 mm) that enables two operational modes: large-scale magnetic field gradients for droplet navigation and localized uniform fields for controlled deformation. The ferrofluid's fluid-like compliance facilitates soft-soft interaction with tissue, reducing artifacts from probe stiffness mismatch. Quantitative tests across sucrose solutions (0.8-83 mPa·s) and agar gels (0.4-142 kPa) showed agreement with viscometer and indentation standards (with all errors under 10%, except for the case with 1 mPa·s viscosity, where the Brownian motion at the low viscosity affects the accuracy). The method was further validated in biological tissue, demonstrating 1.6% deviation from reference measurements. This integrated ferrofluid-magnetic tweezer platform provides a minimally invasive, compliance-matched approach for viscoelastic characterization of soft materials and tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.