ArticleAmerican journal of hematology2026
Late Cytomegalovirus Infections After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.
Article in American journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (ptCY) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with letermovir have changed the clinical epidemiology of CMV infection. We studied the incidence, risk factors for, and outcomes of CMV infection after Day + 90 of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). The patient cohort consisted of 2106 alloHCT patients treated from 2015 to 2022 with a single alloHCT. Fifty-seven percent of patients received ptCY. Forty-three percent of patients received letermovir. We performed landmark analysis of the cumulative incidence of CMV-emia with the competing risk of death from Day + 0 to +360 in 90-day intervals. Regression analyses of baseline and time-dependent covariates for CMV-emia and survival were performed for each interval. The cumulative incidence of CMV-emia (≥ 500 IU CMV DNA/mL) was associated with donor/recipient CMV serostatus. In the highest risk CMV serostatus donor negative and recipient positive (D-R+) group, the cumulative incidence was 24.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.3-27.3), 9 (95% CI: 6.9-11.1), 5 (95% CI: 3.3-6.7), and 2.1 (95% CI: 0.9-3.3) from Day 0 to 90, 91 to 180, 181 to 270, and 271 to 360, respectively. The primary risk factors associated with CMV incidence were related to acute GVHD. PtCY was associated with a decreased risk of CMV infection. Letermovir prophylaxis did not associate with decreased CMV infection after Day + 90. In conclusion, the risk of CMV infection remains clinically significant until Day + 180, although this is affected by the GVHD status of the patient. Discontinuation of letermovir may be considered after Day + 180.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.