ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2026
Upright MRI Follow-Up for Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization in Low-Grade L4/L5 Spondylolisthesis Suggests Reduced Reoperation Rates Compared With Fusion or Decompression Alone.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWhile spinal fusion is the standard treatment for symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis, evidence on motion-preserving alternatives such as decompression with interlaminar stabilization (D+ILS) remains limited. This study aims to descriptively evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after D+ILS at L4/L5 under strict inclusion criteria, with a specific focus on dynamic spinal assessment using upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsThis prospective observational study involved 30 patients with degenerative low-grade spondylolisthesis at L4/L5 treated with D+ILS using the Coflex interlaminar stabilization device. Further inclusion criteria included symptomatic spinal canal stenosis, significant pain relief following facet joint injections, maintained disc height, and unsuccessful conservative treatment. Outcomes were assessed using functional upright MRI and validated questionnaires.
resultsThe cohort consisted of 13 women and 17 men with a mean age of 69 ± 9 years and an average follow-up of 43 ± 7 months. At last follow-up, upright MRI showed preserved segmental alignment without signs of increased translational motion, along with reductions in spinal canal stenosis and facet cysts. Radiological progression of facet joint osteoarthritis and disc degeneration was mild. Spinopelvic parameters and multifidus muscle morphology remained largely unchanged. Clinically, there were significant improvements in pain, functional disability, and ambulation. One patient (3%) required reoperation for symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration.
conclusionThis study is the first to assess D+ILS in a strictly selected cohort using upright MRI to evaluate postoperative mechanics at mid-term follow-up under physiological load. Our findings suggest that D+ILS may be a feasible motion-preserving treatment concept in carefully selected patients with stable L4/L5 spondylolisthesis. However, given the exploratory design and small cohort, these observations should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis generating and warrant confirmation in controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.