ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2026
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the principal issues hindering primary care research conducted in French and propose practical steps to strengthen its visibility, recognition, and development.
designParticipatory qualitative research.
settingForum on research conducted in French held at an international scientific conference on primary care (2024 Annual Meeting of the North American Primary Care Research Group).
participantsThirty-nine individuals from France, New Brunswick, Ontario, Quebec, and Switzerland attending the forum.
methodsDrawing on the World Café method, 6 groups of 5 to 8 participants addressed 3 discussion topics: skills development for trainees and new researchers; knowledge mobilization; and international collaborative projects. Note-takers' notebooks, plenary notes, and the content of flip charts were thematically and continuously reviewed with NVivo, version 1.7.2. MAIN
findingsParticipants spoke about issues affecting research conducted in French in an environment where science is dominated by English-language studies, including higher impact factors for publications in English and biases in funding application evaluations. Courses of action identified for the international promotion of French-language primary care research emphasized the advancement of multilingualism in science; the relational dimension and networking; training the next generation and career development; various aspects of scientific communication; and adapting funding norms to the needs of Francophone researchers.
conclusionOngoing discussions, initiatives, and analyses aimed at promoting international primary care research conducted in French, including the perspective of patient partners, should be pursued and expanded.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.