ReviewCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2026
Approach to wildfire-related health impacts.
Review in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Family physicians are trusted messengers of climate change.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadienArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the health impacts of wildfires on patients and provide a structured approach for family physicians and other primary care providers in preventing, managing, and monitoring these impacts. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: This review draws on a structured search of Ovid MEDLINE for articles published in the past decade on wildfires, with a focus on clinical relevance to primary care. Additional targeted searches were conducted using Google and Google Scholar to identify grey literature, professional association guidelines, and secondary citations. Guidance from governmental organizations such as the Public Health Agency of Canada and the United States Environmental Protection Agency was also reviewed. MAIN MESSAGE: Wildfires are increasing in frequency, duration, and intensity, and there is growing evidence of their health impacts. These include both immediate and delayed effects of exposure to various air pollutants from fires, consequences for displaced people, and psychological stress. This article summarizes the known health impacts of wildfires and presents a structured approach for interventions in primary care, including patient education, identification of high-risk individuals, optimization of condition-specific management, and monitoring of immediate- and long-term health effects. Quick references, along with additional details and links, are provided to identify higher-risk patients and review major interventions.
conclusionFamily physicians and their teams are well positioned to address the health impacts of wildfires. Through education, management of acute and chronic conditions, and ongoing monitoring, they can play a pivotal role in mitigating the negative health consequences of wildfire exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.