Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42128524›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2026

A tutorial on conducting sample size and power calculations for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with linear mixed models.

Mary Ryan Baumann, Monica Taljaard, Patrick J Heagerty, Michael O Harhay, Guangyu Tong, Rui Wang, Fan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mary Ryan BaumannDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9137-1549
Monica TaljaardMethodological and Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3978-8961
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Michael O HarhayCenter for Clinical Trials Innovation, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0553-674X
Guangyu TongSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Rui WangDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Fan LiSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6183-1893

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-2020C3-21072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are a well-established class of designs for evaluating community-based interventions. An essential task in planning these trials is determining the number of clusters and cluster sizes needed to achieve sufficient statistical power for detecting a clinically relevant effect size. While methods for evaluating the average treatment effect (ATE) for the entire study population are well-established, sample size methods for testing heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTEs), i.e. treatment-covariate interaction or difference in subpopulation-specific treatment effects, in CRTs have only recently been developed. For pre-specified analyses of HTEs in CRTs, effect-modifying covariates should, ideally, be accompanied by sample size or power calculations to ensure the trial has adequate power for the planned analyses. Power analysis for testing HTEs is more complex than for ATEs due to the additional design parameters that must be specified. Power and sample size formulas for testing HTEs via linear mixed-effects models have been separately derived for different cluster-randomized designs, including single and multi-period parallel designs, crossover designs, and stepped-wedge designs, and for continuous and binary outcomes. This tutorial provides a consolidated reference guide for these methods and enhances their accessibility through an online R Shiny Calculator. We further discuss key considerations for conducting sample size and power calculations to test pre-specified HTE hypotheses in CRTs, highlighting the importance of specifying advanced estimates of intracluster correlation coefficients for both outcomes and covariates and their implications for power. The sample size methodology and calculator functionality are demonstrated through a real CRT example.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster AnalysisHumansLinear ModelsResearch DesignSample SizeTreatment Effect Heterogeneitycluster randomized trialseffect modificationheterogeneity of treatment effectintracluster correlation coefficientsample size estimationstepped-wedge designs

Identifiers

PMID42128524
PMCPMC13171178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.