ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026
Local immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of cancer: optimizing efficacy while limiting toxicity?
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intratumoral TIGIT blockade augments antitumor responses and bypasses increased functionality of peripheral TIGIT+ NK cells in mouse and human models of bone and soft tissue sarcoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accumulating evidence from randomized phase 3 trials in multiple tumor types supports the application of neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy to significantly enhance clinical benefit in patients with resectable solid tumors. While systemic immunotherapy in this setting can be very effective, immune-related toxicity and resistance remain important challenges. Local administration of immune checkpoint blockade and/or other immune modulatory agents at lower doses offers a promising alternative strategy. Access to the proximal tumor microenvironment and tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) minimizes systemic exposure and potentially mitigates toxicity without compromising efficacy. Local neoadjuvant immunotherapy may enable more potent immune priming and activation within preserved TDLN, potentially reducing both local and distant recurrence rates and improving clinical outcomes. The availability of post-treatment resection specimens allows for the subsequent in-depth analysis of induced immune responses and co-evolving resistance mechanisms. Notwithstanding these potential advantages, challenges remain, such as lack of consensus on preferred delivery techniques, optimal (combinatorial) agents, dosing, and timing of administration. Carefully designed clinical trials, randomized against systemic administration, are needed to address these issues, establish durable clinical benefit, and guide broader implementation of locally administered neoadjuvant immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.