Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42128519›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Local immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of cancer: optimizing efficacy while limiting toxicity?

Marije A Strikwerda, Lotte L Hoeijmakers, Sophie P G R Veenstra, Alfons J M Van Den Eertwegh, Mariette Labots, Christian U Blank, Constantijne H Mom, Tanja D De Gruijl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marije A StrikwerdaDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands m.strikwerda@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-0694
Lotte L HoeijmakersDepartment of Medical Oncology and Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8431-7557
Sophie P G R VeenstraCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Alfons J M Van Den EertweghCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mariette LabotsCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-1771
Christian U BlankDepartment of Medical Oncology and Division of Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Constantijne H MomDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2838-2031
Tanja D De GruijlCancer Biology and Immunology, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence from randomized phase 3 trials in multiple tumor types supports the application of neoadjuvant or perioperative immunotherapy to significantly enhance clinical benefit in patients with resectable solid tumors. While systemic immunotherapy in this setting can be very effective, immune-related toxicity and resistance remain important challenges. Local administration of immune checkpoint blockade and/or other immune modulatory agents at lower doses offers a promising alternative strategy. Access to the proximal tumor microenvironment and tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) minimizes systemic exposure and potentially mitigates toxicity without compromising efficacy. Local neoadjuvant immunotherapy may enable more potent immune priming and activation within preserved TDLN, potentially reducing both local and distant recurrence rates and improving clinical outcomes. The availability of post-treatment resection specimens allows for the subsequent in-depth analysis of induced immune responses and co-evolving resistance mechanisms. Notwithstanding these potential advantages, challenges remain, such as lack of consensus on preferred delivery techniques, optimal (combinatorial) agents, dosing, and timing of administration. Carefully designed clinical trials, randomized against systemic administration, are needed to address these issues, establish durable clinical benefit, and guide broader implementation of locally administered neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentImmune Checkpoint InhibitorImmunotherapyIntralesionalIntratumoralNeoadjuvant

Identifiers

PMID42128519
PMCPMC13182287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.