Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42128499›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic use (KIPRUN): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial to compare the efficacy and safety of procalcitonin kinetics-guided and absolute procalcitonin value-guided antibiotic initiation in critically ill patients.

Márton Papp, Caner Turan, Nikolett Kiss, László Zubek, Dilan Márk Karim, Péter Hegyi, Zsolt Molnár

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07211620 (KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic Use), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07211620 narecruitingnot on this map

KInetics of Procalcitonin to Reduce Unnecessary aNtibiotic Use (KIPRUN) - Protocol for a Multi-center, Randomized, Superiority Trial to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Procalcitonin Kinetics-guided and Absolute Procalcitonin Value-guided Antibiotic Initiation in Reducing Unnecessary Antibiotic Therapy in Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSemmelweis UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled250ConditionsInfection, SepsisArmsKinetics, Absolute
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Márton PappCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary manolo87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0765-794X
Caner TuranCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Nikolett KissCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
László ZubekCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Dilan Márk KarimCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter HegyiCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1468-4058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAppropriate antibiotic (AB) therapy remains a challenge in intensive care units (ICUs). Guidelines recommend against using procalcitonin (PCT) to guide the initiation of AB therapy, although with low certainty and a very low level of evidence. Recent studies suggest that changes in PCT levels may be more accurate than a single measurement; however, this has never been tested in a randomised trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this multicentre, randomised controlled trial (RCT), we aim to compare the efficacy and safety of two different PCT protocols for initiating AB therapy. Hemodynamically stable, critically ill adult patients with suspected new-onset infection at admission or during ICU stay will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. In the treatment arm (Kinetics Group, KG), initiation of AB treatment is strongly recommended if PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL and increases by more than 100% compared with the previous day. In the control arm (Absolute Group, AG), the initiation of AB treatment is strongly recommended if PCT ≥0.5 ng/mL. The primary outcome will be the rate of unnecessary AB therapy: 72 hours after recruitment, an independent intensivist, microbiologist and infectologist will determine whether the therapy was necessary, using all relevant clinical, microbiological and radiographic results. If no consensus is reached, a decision will be made by secret vote. We plan to enrol 250 participants in the study, with 80% statistical power and a 5% alpha level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the National Centre for Public Health and Pharmacy (BM/20019/2025). We plan to present our results at relevant national and international conferences and meetings and to submit them for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Moreover, we plan to disseminate the results to important stakeholders in the Hungarian healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This is the first version of the trial protocol, prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT 2025 guideline (version 1.0, dated 30 September 2025). The trial has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07211620).

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCritical IllnessProcalcitoninBiomarkersEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkersProcalcitoninAdult intensive & critical careAntibioticsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID42128499
PMCPMC13182494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.