Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42128491›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2026

Costs and benefits of replacing preventive antenatal iron and folic acid with multiple micronutrients in 25 low- and middle-income countries.

John Hoddinott, Clayton Ajello, Robert E Black, Jennifer Busch-Hallen, Martin Mwangi, Dylan Walters, Filomena Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John HoddinottDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Charles H Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, and Department of Global Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA jfh246@cornell.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0590-3917
Clayton AjelloKirk Humanitarian, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert E BlackDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer Busch-HallenMaternal and Newborn Health and Nutrition, Nutrition International, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Martin MwangiHealthy Mothers Healthy Babies Program, Micronutrient Forum, Washington, DC, USA.
Dylan WaltersHealth Economics Unit, Nutrition International, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Filomena GomesHealthy Mothers Healthy Babies Program, Micronutrient Forum, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMicronutrient deficiencies during pregnancy have serious consequences for both mother and child; thus the longstanding standard of care in low- and low-middle income countries (LMICs) has been daily prenatal iron-folic acid (IFA) supplementation. While prenatal multiple micronutrient supplements (MMSs) provide additional significant benefits in comparison to IFA supplements, the view that MMS is too expensive has hindered national MMS adoption. However, increased competition, volume procurement and the use of advanced purchase commitments have significantly reduced the cost of MMS.

methodsUsing new cost data, we estimate the benefits of replacing IFA with MMS in both health (averted low birth weights (LBWs), stillbirths and female neonatal mortality) and monetary (costs of averted LBW and death; total economic value; benefit-cost ratios) terms in 25 LMICs with the greatest burden of LBW. A number of scenarios describing different coverage and procurement cost scenarios are explored.

resultsReplacing preventive antenatal IFA with MMS would avert 3 514 594 LBW births, 186 369 stillbirths and 218 914 female neonatal deaths over 5 years in these countries. Providing MMS to all pregnant women receiving at least one antenatal care visit averts 7 272 320 LBW, 473 471 stillbirths and 541 591 female neonatal deaths. The total cost of replacing IFA with MMS ranges from US$201.8 million to US$1.326 billion, equivalent to between 0.5% and 3.0% of current spending on efforts to reduce undernutrition. Using the most conservative estimate, this would generate US$7.19 billion in economic returns and a benefit-cost ratio greater than 10. The cost of averting a stillbirth or neonatal death ranges from US$497 to US$1306.

conclusionReplacing prenatal IFA with MMS cost-effectively generates large health benefits.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFolic AcidIronMicronutrientsPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareCost-Benefit AnalysisDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornPregnancyStillbirthFolic AcidIronMicronutrientsGlobal HealthHealth economicsHealth policyMaternal healthNutrition

Identifiers

PMID42128491
PMCPMC13182302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.