ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026
Mtb-Specific Interferon-Gamma ELISpot Assays Have Greater Sensitivity for Detecting Mtb Infection Compared to Tuberculin Skin Test in a Cohort of Experimentally M. tuberculosis-Infected Macaques.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis outbreaks in nonhuman primate (NHP) colonies can result in disastrous financial, scientific, animal welfare, and public health outcomes. Tuberculin skin testing (TST) has been the standard diagnostic method for identifying Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection in NHPs but has limited sensitivity and specificity. In humans, Mtb-specific interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) have become the preferred diagnostic method, overcoming significant limitations of the TST. We compared the diagnostic qualities of the TST and IGRA in a cohort of 673 rhesus and cynomolgus macaques with experimental Mtb infection. Serial TST and IGRA data were curated retrospectively for animals before and after Mtb infection and temporally matched to assess sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the 2 tests. The overall sensitivity of the IGRA was 0.84 compared with 0.49 sensitivity of the TST test in detecting Mtb infection. Specificity of the IGRA and the TST was 0.83 and 1.0, respectively, with an overall agreement rate of 72% between the 2 tests. Sensitivity peaked at 3-5 weeks postinfection for TST and 5-7 weeks for IGRA. Data from a second cohort of animals (n = 227) that were not experimentally infected with Mtb, but for whom testing was done for screening and investigational purposes, demonstrated an agreement rate of 96%. To our knowledge, this is the largest reported comparison of TST and IGRA testing in NHPs. Although IGRAs are more labor intensive than TSTs, our data suggest that IGRAs have better diagnostic accuracy in detecting Mtb infection. Our data also suggest that the threshold for a positive TST could be lowered to improve sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.