ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2026
Eperisone-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eperisone hydrochloride is a centrally acting muscle relaxant commonly prescribed for musculoskeletal pain, particularly in Korea and Japan. It induces relaxation of skeletal and vascular smooth muscle through central nervous system modulation and peripheral mechanisms, although its precise biochemical pathway remains unclear. While generally well tolerated, eperisone has been reported to cause immediate hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis. Because eperisone is frequently co-prescribed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), these reactions are often misdiagnosed as NSAID hypersensitivity, leading to unnecessary drug discontinuation and suboptimal pain management. A review of published case reports and pharmacovigilance data indicates that most eperisone-associated reactions are immediate-type, with anaphylaxis being clinically significant yet underrecognized. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests show variable diagnostic reliability, whereas drug provocation tests (DPTs) demonstrate the highest diagnostic accuracy and remain the gold standard. Basophil activation tests and serum tryptase measurement during DPT may serve as complementary diagnostic tools. Accurate identification of eperisone hypersensitivity is essential for preventing recurrent anaphylaxis and avoiding unnecessary NSAID discontinuation. This review summarizes the epidemiology, clinical features, and diagnostic strategies of eperisone hypersensitivity and emphasizes the importance of enhancing clinical awareness and referring affected patients to allergy specialists for proper evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.