Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127986›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2026

Methodological evaluation of the psychometric properties of medication-related quality indicators in residential aged care homes: a systematic review.

Lakeesha S Liyanage, Mark Naunton, Louise S Cox, Thilini Sudeshika, Gregory M Peterson, Sam Kosari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lakeesha S LiyanageDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-8596
Mark NauntonDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Louise S CoxDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Thilini SudeshikaDiscipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882
Sam KosariSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT Bundoora West Campus, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuality indicators (QIs) are important for tracking and enhancing healthcare quality. In residential aged care homes (RACHs), medication-related QIs help ensure the quality of medication usage and patient care. To ensure the effective use of QIs, it is essential that they are reliable and satisfy other psychometric properties. This study explored the psychometric properties, including validity, reliability, feasibility, applicability, sensitivity, measurability, appropriateness, and usefulness, of medication-related QIs used in RACHs, as well as the methodologies employed in studies evaluating these QIs.

methodsA systematic search was conducted using CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection, covering studies published since inception until December 2025. Covidence software was used for title and abstract screening and full-text reviewing. Medication-related QIs, psychometric properties evaluated, and the employed methodology were extracted from the studies and were critically analyzed to provide an understanding of current QI evaluation techniques.

resultsThe search identified 15 247 studies. After removing duplicates and applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 21 full-text studies were included, with an average methodological quality score of 60% based on the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Psychotropic drug use and polypharmacy were commonly tested medication-related QIs. Validity (reported in 12 studies), reliability (in 9 studies), and feasibility (in 8 studies) were the most frequently assessed psychometric properties. The Delphi method was the primary approach for validity and feasibility testing.

conclusionsThere were inconsistencies among the methods used for testing the psychometric properties of the QIs. This highlights the need for a standardized protocol for testing medication-related QIs for use in aged care to ensure their reliability and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedQuality Indicators, Health CareHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID42127986
PMCPMC13198374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.