Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127954›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Microbe2026

Persistent spread of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in acute care hospitals in 36 European countries (the CCRE survey): a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional, epidemiological, microbiological, and genomic surveillance study.

Inga Fröding, Sophia David, Corin Yeats, Khalil Abu-Dahab, Barbara Albiger, Nabil-Fareed Alikhan, Erik Alm, Sara Byfors, Natacha Couto, Julio Diaz Caballero and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Microbe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. iMeta · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Emergence and Dissemination of NDM+OXA-48-like Co-ProducingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Inga FrödingThe Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophia DavidCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Corin YeatsCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Khalil Abu-DahabCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Barbara AlbigerEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Nabil-Fareed AlikhanCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Erik AlmEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Sara ByforsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Natacha CoutoCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Julio Diaz CaballeroCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christian G GiskeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erika MatuschekEuropean Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Development Laboratory, Växjö, Sweden.
Marius LinkeviciusEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Daniel PalmEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Olov SvartströmEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Marc J StruelensFaculty of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Karin Tegmark WisellThe Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
Dominique L MonnetEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden.
Alma BrolundThe Public Health Agency of Sweden, Solna, Sweden.
David M AanensenCentre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anke KohlenbergEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Electronic address: anke.kohlenberg@ecdc.europa.eu.
EURGen-Net CCRE Survey Working Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pose a substantial threat to patients and health-care systems. We conducted a survey of carbapenem-resistant and/or colistin-resistant Enterobacterales (CCRE survey) in 37 European countries to describe their occurrence, geographical distribution, and population dynamics and inform control policies. We report the results of Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex isolates in this study.

methodsIn this cross-sectional, epidemiological, microbiological, and genomic study conducted in all EU, European Economic Area and EU candidate countries as of 2019, hospital microbiology laboratories were selected on the basis of population coverage. Participating laboratories collected, from patient samples, the first ten successive isolates of carbapenem-resistant or carbapenem-susceptible increased exposure (carbapenem-R/I) K pneumoniae species complex or Escherichia coli, and carbapenem-susceptible (carbapenem-S) comparator isolates of the same species, accompanied by patient epidemiological and clinical information. Isolate collection started in 2019, with three possible starting dates-ie, March 1, April 1, or May 1, 2019, and ended after collection of ten carbapenem-R/I and carbapenem-S isolates or a maximum period of 6 months. Isolates were tested for phenotypic susceptibility to 16 antimicrobial agents of relevance to K pneumoniae species complex. Whole-genome sequencing was performed centrally using Illumina technology. Isolates from the CCRE survey were compared with those from the European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) study.

findings1566 carbapenem-R/I and 1407 carbapenem-S K pneumoniae species complex isolates collected from patients in 302 hospitals in 36 countries (one country did not send isolates) were analysed in this study. The high-risk lineages identified during a previous similar survey in 2013-14 (EuSCAPE) were found to continue to circulate across European hospitals in 2019 (ST11, ST15, ST101, and ST258/512). Moreover, concerning shifts in the pathogen population were observed. First, a higher proportion of carbapenem-R/I isolates was found to carry a carbapenemase gene in the CCRE survey (1398 [89·3%] of 1566) than in EuSCAPE (657 [69·6%] of 944), mainly related to increased acquisition of carbapenemase genes by high-risk lineages. Of note, among ST307 isolates from all hospitals, the proportion of carbapenem-R/I isolates carrying a carbapenemase gene increased from 14 (60·9%) of 23 in EuSCAPE to 164 (91·1%) of 180 in the CCRE survey. Second, an expansion of emerging multidrug-resistant lineages (ST147, ST307, and ST39) was also noted: Among 113 hospitals that contributed K pneumoniae species complex isolates to both EuSCAPE and the CCRE survey, the proportion of ST147 increased from 16 (3·4%) of 476 in EuSCAPE to 49 (7·4%) of 662 carbapenem-R/I isolates in the CCRE survey, that of ST307 increased from 15 (3·2%) of 476 to 88 (13·3%) of 662, and that of ST39 increased from 3 (0·6%) of 476 to 10 (1·5%) of 662. Third, there was an increased spread of isolates harbouring acquired virulence loci: isolates with the highest Kleborate virulence score of five increased from 7 (0·4%) of 1717 in EuSCAPE to 40 (1·3%) of 2973 in the CCRE survey. Notably, the increase was mainly observed in the carbapenem-S-group.

interpretationThe survey findings portray an escalating epidemiological situation and suggest that control measures have not been able to interrupt transmission of high-risk lineages of carbapenemase-producing K pneumoniae in European hospitals. The heterogeneous and evolving situation with regards to circulating lineages and dominant carbapenemase genes requires strengthening and continuous adaptation of diagnostic, treatment, and control measures guided by genomic surveillance.

fundingEuropean Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance.

Indexed as

Bacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeHospitalsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID42127954
PMCPMC13259977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.