ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026
Baseline clinical and laboratory profiles at breast cancer diagnosis in Tanzania: differences by HIV status.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWomen living with HIV (WLHIV) may present with distinct clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. While previous studies, including multi-country cohorts such as the ABC-DO study, have described baseline patient and tumor features, data on pre-treatment laboratory parameters in routine clinical settings remain limited. This study aimed to characterize baseline clinical and laboratory factors at diagnosis and assess differences by HIV status.
methodsWe analyzed data from women newly diagnosed with breast cancer at three tertiary hospitals in Tanzania. HIV status was obtained from medical records or provider-initiated testing. Baseline clinical and laboratory variables measured before systemic cancer therapy were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with HIV status.
resultsAmong 425 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, 47 (11%) were living with HIV. Advanced disease at presentation was common across the cohort. Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1.5 × 10
conclusionsWLHIV more frequently presented with neutropenia and advanced disease at diagnosis. By identifying clinically relevant differences in hematologic status are detectable at presentation using routinely collected data, this study addresses a key gap in real-world evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. These findings provide clinically actionable insight into baseline patient status at entry into cancer care and may inform early clinical assessment and supportive care planning in resource-constrained settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.