ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Leveraging Text Messaging and Behavior Theory to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Despite recommendations for screening to begin at the age of 45 years, significant disparities persist, particularly among medically underserved populations. Objective: This study examines the effectiveness of SMS text messaging reminders in improving CRC screening rates across 2 large federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) serving vulnerable populations. Methods: The study included 4822 adults aged ≥45 years, receiving care at 2 large FQHC networks in Texas and California. Participants were assigned to one of four groups: (1) control (no SMS text messages), (2) single-outreach SMS text overdue message, (3) three-week SMS overdue and reminder text messages, and (4) six-week SMS text messages that were informed by behavior theory. Data were collected from May 2023 to July 2024. The outcome measure was a binary indicator of whether the participant underwent 1 of 3 CRC tests, fecal immunochemical test, colonoscopy, and Cologuard, within 90 days of completing the SMS text messaging reminders. Independent variables included demographic, geographic, clinical, and primary care access variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine associations between CRC screening completion and the SMS text messaging reminder groups, adjusting for covariates. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were reported. Results: In the combined 3-test model, patients in the single-outreach SMS text message (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.47) and the 3-week SMS text message (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05-1.53) groups had higher odds of completing the screening test compared to those in the control group. Within the fecal immunochemical test-only model, patients in the 3-week SMS text message group (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.00-1.56) were more likely to complete the screening test. Within the Cologuard-only model, patients in the 3-week SMS text message group (aOR 7.01, 95% CI 1.96-25.07) and the 6-week SMS text message group (aOR 5.75, 95% CI 1.53-21.61) had significantly higher odds of CRC screening completion. Conclusions: The findings highlight that moderate-frequency SMS text messaging reminders can effectively increase CRC screening rates in FQHCs; however, critical factors include the timing and frequency of these reminders. The 3-week intervention was associated with improved screening uptake, whereas the 6-week theory-informed intervention did not demonstrate a significant advantage over the control group, potentially reflecting a ceiling effect or message fatigue associated with more frequent messaging. Additionally, the study highlights unique screening patterns that contradict previous literature, underscoring the importance of a tailored approach for vulnerable communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.