Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127422›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

A Digital Assistive System for Maintaining Nutrition and Mobility in Older Adults: Usability and Feasibility Findings From a Pilot Study.

Mareike Foerster, Marianne Timper, René Puhlemann, Vincent Quinten, Rebecca Diekmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mareike FoersterDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, 26129, Germany, +49 4417984882.ORCID 0009-0006-0354-5745
Marianne TimperDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, 26129, Germany, +49 4417984882.ORCID 0009-0000-5801-9888
René PuhlemannDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, 26129, Germany, +49 4417984882.ORCID 0009-0006-2444-8397
Vincent QuintenDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, 26129, Germany, +49 4417984882.ORCID 0000-0001-7770-9884
Rebecca DiekmannDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, Oldenburg, Lower Saxony, 26129, Germany, +49 4417984882.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-3832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Due to demographic changes, the number of older people is increasing, often accompanied by limitations in mobility, nutrition, and independence. Preventive monitoring is rare, as care systems struggle with staff shortages and limited resources. Technical assistance systems can support older people in self-assessing their health and maintaining independence. We developed the AS-Tra system, which combines an application with a measurement and training station (MuTS), to enable early detection of nutrition and mobility-related deficits and risks. Objective: This paper presents the pilot study of the AS-Tra system with the aim of evaluating its usability and testing the feasibility of collecting health-related data from older adults (≥70 y) with early/mild deficiencies in nutritional state and mobility in preparation for a future randomized controlled trial. Methods: The system used in this 4-week pilot study was developed as a complex intervention in accordance with the Medical Research Council framework. Participants (target n=10) were recruited through a participant registry. They completed standardized mobility assessments (grip strength, Timed "Up and Go," and 5-Time Chair Rise) at baseline and after 1, 2, and 4 weeks (T0, T1, and T2, respectively). Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form and short physical performance battery were recorded at baseline and at T2. Participants received a tablet app for regularly documenting nutrition and an activity sensor for 7 days of physical activity monitoring and performed weekly training starting at T0. At T2, the System Usability Scale (SUS) and feedback questionnaires (Evaluation Overall System [EOS] questionnaire-the evaluation of all subcomponents on a scale of 1-5, weekly Experience Report) were additionally collected. Data were analyzed descriptively using IBM SPSS Statistics, in which data were shown as total numbers, percentages, and means with SDs, and data from the activity sensor were displayed and analyzed using Python. Results: A total of 9 older adults, with 1 dropout (mean 80, SD 5 y, 50% female), participated in this study. The SUS score was good (mean 79, SD 13.4 points). The MuTS devices had minor technical problems (in <17% of MuTS sessions), while 57% (17/30) of the users experienced instability issues with the food diary in the tablet app. The average overall system ratings were positive, with an EOS score of 2.01 (SD 0.99). Conclusions: The usability of the technical assistance system used in this study was rated as good. The data collection using questionnaires, sensors, and automated assessments proved feasible. The biggest challenge was the tablet-based food diary, which still needs improvement before the effectiveness of the AS-Tra system regarding mobility and nutritional status can be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationNutritional StatusAgedAged, 80 and overDigital HealthFeasibility StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNutrition AssessmentPilot Projectsfeasibilitygerontechnologyindependenceinteractive health promotionmobilitynutritionolder adultstechnical assistance systemusability

Identifiers

PMID42127422
PMCPMC13170999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.