ArticleThe ISME journal2026
Impact of maternal, infant, and household factors on early-life gut microbiome development in a rural setting.
Article in The ISME journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-life gut microbiome development is influenced by host, microbial, environmental, and social factors. Rural infants typically exhibit greater microbial diversity than their urban counterparts, yet microbiome maturation patterns in less industrialized settings remain underexplored. Additionally, though microbial eukaryotes are integral to gut ecology, most studies to date have focused predominantly on bacterial communities. Using shallow shotgun metagenomics and 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, we characterized bacterial and eukaryotic gut microbiomes in an intensively sampled longitudinal cohort of 10 infants from a rural community in Morelos, Mexico, each followed monthly from the first to the 18th month, providing a detailed view of early-life microbiome development in a low-resource setting. Although both bacterial and eukaryotic alpha diversity increased over time, they showed distinct colonization trajectories. Age, delivery mode, and environmental exposures, such as animal contact and household factors, influenced bacterial and eukaryotic community compositions, and bacterial metabolic composition. Inter-kingdom microbial networks varied with age, with a reduction in taxonomic diversity after the first year of life. Age and birth mode also influenced changes in the overall community structure and connectivity of microbial co-occurrence patterns, but did not impact the associations among specific microbial taxa. Functional profiling revealed that bacterial metabolic potential diversified with age, whereas the mode of birth had a minimal impact on functional variation. These findings highlight the dynamic nature of bacterial and eukaryotic microbiota in early life and underscore the need to explore how rural environmental exposures shape microbial maturation, with potential implications for immune development and long-term health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.