Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127318›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

A Research on the Relationship Between Intensive Care Nurses' Individual and Professional Characteristics, Decision-Making Styles, and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Nursing.

Songül Türkel, Şehrinaz Polat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Songül TürkelDepartment of General Surgery, Trauma and Emergency Surgery Unit, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Şehrinaz PolatIstanbul University Nursing Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis descriptive correlational study aimed to examine the relationships between intensive care nurses' individual and professional characteristics, decision-making styles, and attitudes toward evidence-based nursing practice.

designCross-sectional study.

methodsThe study was conducted with 279 intensive care nurses working in the intensive care units of two university hospitals in Istanbul between October and December 2022. Data were collected using a survey comprising a Descriptive Information Form, the Nurse Decision Making Scale, and the Evidence-Based Nursing Attitude Questionnaire.

resultsA structural equation model was developed to analyse the relationships among variables. Examination of path coefficients revealed that nurses' decision-making levels were significantly predicted by the beliefs and expectations toward the EBNP subscale of evidence-based nursing practice (β2 = 0.48, p < 0.001, t = 9.67), duration of intensive care professional experience (β2 = 0.13, p = 0.008, t = 2.66), and engagement with current professional publications (β2 = 0.22, p < 0.001, t = 4.33). The regression model accounted for 35% of the variance in nurses' decision-making levels.

conclusionDespite generally positive attitudes toward evidence-based nursing among intensive care nurses, the majority demonstrated a strong tendency toward intuitive decision-making approaches. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical Care NursingDecision MakingEvidence-Based NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyclinical decision‐makingdecision‐makingevidence‐based nursingintensive carenurse

Identifiers

PMID42127318
PMCPMC13170972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.