ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
Polyrhythms in the Brain: Metrical Priming, Acoustic Balance, and Perceptual Biases.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In polyrhythms, two pulse trains at different rates are presented simultaneously, yet listeners perceive only one as the underlying beat. This makes polyrhythms ideal for studying neural correlates of divergent percepts from identical stimuli. Across two electroencephalographic studies, we distinguished acoustic balance from perceptual ambiguity by designing stimuli that controlled for acoustic imbalances within the power spectrum and perceptual biases in polyrhythm beat perception. Using frequency tagging, we assessed metrical priming effects in 3:4 (Study 1: perceptual ambiguity) and 2:3 (Study 2: acoustic balance) polyrhythms under three conditions: no priming, fast-pulse priming, and slow-pulse priming. In Study 1, priming the 3-beat slightly increased neural activity at its periodicity. In Study 2, participants tapped the perceived beat after each trial, enabling trial classification by subjective perception. This revealed close correspondence between perceived beat and neural activity, an effect obscured in the priming-based analysis. Tapping responses revealed differences in priming success across conditions and individuals, highlighting the need for trial-by-trial measures of perceived beat in polyrhythm studies assessing endogenous contributions to beat perception. Together, the two studies show that polyrhythm perception is influenced by metrical priming at both behavioral and neural levels, but is also constrained by perceptual biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.