Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127316›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

Polyrhythms in the Brain: Metrical Priming, Acoustic Balance, and Perceptual Biases.

Cecilie Møller, Alexandre Celma-Miralles, Heidi Bliddal Borges, Jan Stupacher, Christian Bech Christensen, Peter Vuust, Preben Kidmose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cecilie MøllerCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-7608
Alexandre Celma-MirallesCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2557-6308
Heidi Bliddal BorgesDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0006-8725-0089
Jan StupacherCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-2508
Christian Bech ChristensenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9531-523X
Peter VuustCenter for Music in the Brain, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music Aarhus/Aalborg, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4908-735X
Preben KidmoseDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8628-8057

Funding

Danish National Research Foundation DNRF117Interacting Minds Centre SeedFundingProject24794Købmand herman Sallings FondThe Lundbeck Foundation R469-2024-1573
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In polyrhythms, two pulse trains at different rates are presented simultaneously, yet listeners perceive only one as the underlying beat. This makes polyrhythms ideal for studying neural correlates of divergent percepts from identical stimuli. Across two electroencephalographic studies, we distinguished acoustic balance from perceptual ambiguity by designing stimuli that controlled for acoustic imbalances within the power spectrum and perceptual biases in polyrhythm beat perception. Using frequency tagging, we assessed metrical priming effects in 3:4 (Study 1: perceptual ambiguity) and 2:3 (Study 2: acoustic balance) polyrhythms under three conditions: no priming, fast-pulse priming, and slow-pulse priming. In Study 1, priming the 3-beat slightly increased neural activity at its periodicity. In Study 2, participants tapped the perceived beat after each trial, enabling trial classification by subjective perception. This revealed close correspondence between perceived beat and neural activity, an effect obscured in the priming-based analysis. Tapping responses revealed differences in priming success across conditions and individuals, highlighting the need for trial-by-trial measures of perceived beat in polyrhythm studies assessing endogenous contributions to beat perception. Together, the two studies show that polyrhythm perception is influenced by metrical priming at both behavioral and neural levels, but is also constrained by perceptual biases.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionBrainPeriodicityAcoustic StimulationAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultambiguous rhythmsbeat perceptionEEGfrequency taggingmusicprimingsensorimotor synchronization

Identifiers

PMID42127316
PMCPMC13170993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.