ArticlePLoS computational biology2026
A multi-frequency whole-brain neural mass model with homeostatic feedback inhibition.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BioTester: an AI-driven automated testing framework for identifying potential quality risks in bioinformatics software.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Whole-brain models are valuable tools for understanding brain dynamics in health and disease by enabling the testing of causal mechanisms and identification of therapeutic targets through dynamic simulations. Among these models, biophysically inspired neural mass models have been widely used to simulate electrophysiological recordings, such as MEG and EEG. However, traditional models face limitations, including susceptibility to over-saturation of the sigmoid function by model hyperexcitability, which constrains their ability to capture the full richness of neural dynamics. Here, we thoroughly characterize a previously introduced multi-frequency Jansen-Rit neural mass model with inhibitory synaptic plasticity (ISP) aimed at overcoming these limitations. The ISP adjusts inhibitory feedback onto pyramidal neurons to clamp their firing rates around a target value. This mechanism allows for fine control of neuronal firing rates, preventing over-saturation in whole-brain simulations. In this model, we analyzed how different model parameters modulate oscillatory frequency and connectivity. As a demonstration, we considered simultaneously fitting EEG and fMRI recordings during NREM sleep. Bifurcation analysis showed that ISP widened the range of parameters in which the model exhibited sustained oscillations; the target firing rate can modulate oscillatory dynamics, producing different oscillatory regimes, from slower (δ, θ and α) to faster (β and γ) oscillations. High-frequency activity emerged from low global coupling, high firing rates, and a high proportion of γ versus α subpopulations. The ISP was necessary in the multi-frequency model to successfully fit EEG functional connectivity across frequency bands. Finally, ISP-controlled reductions in excitability reproduced both the slow-wave activity and the reduced connectivity in NREM sleep. Altogether, our model is compatible with biological evidence of the effects of excitability on modulating brain rhythms and connectivity, as observed in sleep, neurodegeneration, and chemical neuromodulation. This biophysical model with ISP provides a springboard for realistic brain simulations in health and disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.