SynthesisPloS one2026
The impact of walking on creative thinking: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWalking is associated with many benefits, from improved mental health to a reduced risk of mortality - but can it boost creative thinking? Current evidence suggests a positive effect of physical activity on creative thinking, but the specific effect of walking has not been adequately explored.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of the PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Scopus, and ProQuest databases from inception to 8 January 2025 using search terms related to walking and creativity. We then performed meta-analyses of Cohen's d effect sizes to assess the effect of walking on creative thinking, as represented by divergent thinking (the ability to generate novel and useful ideas) and convergent thinking (the ability to analyze and select ideas to find the best solution). We assessed study quality using a creativity-specific tool, and the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Framework.
resultsWe identified 23 studies (12 randomized experimental studies, nine non-randomized experimental studies, two observational studies) from 16 articles including a total of 1,036 participants, most of whom were post-secondary students. We found moderate certainty evidence of a large effect of walking on divergent thinking (d = 0.93 [95% CI 0.44, 1.42]), and very uncertain evidence of a null effect of walking on convergent thinking (d = 0.16 [95% CI -0.31, 0.63]). Sensitivity analyses of randomized trials only found similarly large effects of walking on divergent thinking ability (d = 0.82 [95% CI 0.35, 1.28]).
conclusionResults suggest that walking likely results in a large increase in divergent thinking, indicating its potential as an intervention to stimulate creative idea generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.