Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127033›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Cost-effectiveness analysis of mepolizumab among patients with severe asthma from the Chinese societal perspective.

Chaohao Shi, Yang Wang, Chongqing Tan, Xiaohui Zeng, Qiao Liu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03562195 (A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03562195 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind, Parallel Group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Severe Asthma With Eosinophilic Inflammation

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2018 to 2022Enrolled300ConditionsAsthmaArmsMepolizumab 100 milligrams, Placebo, Salbutamol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaohao ShiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Pathology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chongqing TanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaohui ZengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qiao LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-6236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with severe asthma, particularly those with an eosinophilic phenotype, face a limited array of treatment options. The Mepolizumab Efficacy in Patients with Severe Asthma (MENSA) trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03562195) has underscored the potential therapeutic benefits of mepolizumab as an adjunctive treatment for this patient group. However, the high cost of mepolizumab therapy presents significant economic challenges that may impede its widespread adoption in China. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab from a societal perspective within the Chinese population suffering from severe asthma.

methodsA Markov model spanning a lifetime horizon and employing a 2-week cycle was constructed. The model incorporated clinically significant exacerbations (CSEs) rates from the MENSA trial, along with asthma mortality rates, costs, and health state utilities, sourced from a broad spectrum of literature and national databases. Both costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted annually at 5%. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the primary model output and compared to a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold range of $15,217 to $38,042 per quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). The model's robustness was evaluated through sensitivity analyses.

resultsThe base-case analysis indicated an ICER of $848.79 per QALY for mepolizumab, fall below the lower limit of the predefined WTP threshold. Subgroup analyses confirmed this finding across different subpopulations. Deterministic sensitivity analyses showed that mepolizumab's ICER remained below the lower limit of the predefined WTP threshold even under significant parameter variations. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses further demonstrated mepolizumab's cost-effectiveness advantage over placebo.

conclusionOur study concluded that mepolizumab is a cost-effectiveness treatment option for severe asthma in China, applicable across various patient subgroups. This finding is crucial for healthcare decision-makers in China, where balancing cost and health outcomes is essential due to limited resources.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaCost-Effectiveness AnalysisAdultChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedmepolizumab

Identifiers

PMID42127033
PMCPMC13170840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.