Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127032›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Automating multi-label crisis detection in psychological support hotlines with pre-trained models.

Shuying Rao, Guifeng Deng, Haidong Song, Qiuxia Chen, Mingjin Luo, Yaoyun Zhang, Sha Zhao, Gang Pan, Tao Li, Haiteng Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuying RaoAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Guifeng DengAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1940-7797
Haidong SongAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qiuxia ChenAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Mingjin LuoAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, United States of America.
Sha ZhaoLiangzhu Laboratory, MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Gang PanLiangzhu Laboratory, MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, State Key Laboratory of Brain-machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Tao LiAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Haiteng JiangAffiliated Mental Health Center and Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital and School of Brain Science and Brain Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-8413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychological support hotlines provide immediate help to individuals in crisis, with operators assessing emotional states and suicide risk. However, increasing demand has led to a shortage of trained professionals, emphasizing the need for AI-driven crisis detection models. This study included 1,057 calls from the Hangzhou Hotline (2022-2023) to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning and pre-trained models in detecting psychological crises using audio (Wave2Vec, Whisper) and transcribed text (RoBERTa, GPT). We adopted two strategies: deep learning classification with pre-trained models and Large Language Models (LLMs)-based prediction via prompt engineering (GPT-4 and DeepSeek series). The deep learning framework, employing GPT embeddings excelled in multi-label predictions compared to auditory model, achieving 80.48% [80.18%, 80.78%] F1 scores for identifying high-risk calls in prospective tests. Fusion experiments revealed that acoustic features offered negligible predictive value compared with text semantics. Notably, GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1, utilizing few-shot learning, demonstrated performance comparable to the GPT-embedding deep learning model across multiple tasks. This suggests that their advanced Chain-of-Thought reasoning effectively mitigates data dependency gap, enabling LLMs to align with clinical domains using a few examples. Expert evaluation confirmed the clinical applicability of GPT-generated explanations. Taken together, these findings highlight the potential of LLMs in mental health crisis detection and lay the foundation for future research.

Identifiers

PMID42127032
PMCPMC13170875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.