ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Automating multi-label crisis detection in psychological support hotlines with pre-trained models.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative AI as interactional infrastructure for meaning-centered care in later life.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological support hotlines provide immediate help to individuals in crisis, with operators assessing emotional states and suicide risk. However, increasing demand has led to a shortage of trained professionals, emphasizing the need for AI-driven crisis detection models. This study included 1,057 calls from the Hangzhou Hotline (2022-2023) to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning and pre-trained models in detecting psychological crises using audio (Wave2Vec, Whisper) and transcribed text (RoBERTa, GPT). We adopted two strategies: deep learning classification with pre-trained models and Large Language Models (LLMs)-based prediction via prompt engineering (GPT-4 and DeepSeek series). The deep learning framework, employing GPT embeddings excelled in multi-label predictions compared to auditory model, achieving 80.48% [80.18%, 80.78%] F1 scores for identifying high-risk calls in prospective tests. Fusion experiments revealed that acoustic features offered negligible predictive value compared with text semantics. Notably, GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1, utilizing few-shot learning, demonstrated performance comparable to the GPT-embedding deep learning model across multiple tasks. This suggests that their advanced Chain-of-Thought reasoning effectively mitigates data dependency gap, enabling LLMs to align with clinical domains using a few examples. Expert evaluation confirmed the clinical applicability of GPT-generated explanations. Taken together, these findings highlight the potential of LLMs in mental health crisis detection and lay the foundation for future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.