ArticlePloS one2026
Short-term coastal forest responses to a hurricane-scale freshwater and saltwater flooding experiment.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term coastal forest responses to a hurricane-scale freshwater and saltwater flooding experiment.PloS one · 2026Article
- Short-term experimental flooding impacts soil biogeochemistry but not aboveground vegetation in a coastal forest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coastal upland forests are exposed to intensifying precipitation regimes and sea level rise, increasing tree mortality and transforming these coastal forests into wetland ecosystems. While the ultimate outcome of long-term exposure to these perturbations is known to be an ecosystem state change from upland forest to wetland, the resistance of forests to the first novel exposure to flooding and salinity is relatively unknown. The Terrestrial Ecosystem Manipulation to Probe the Effects of Storm Treatments (TEMPEST) experiment uses ecosystem-scale (2000 m2) experimental flooding plots to decouple two distinct disturbances associated with hydrological extremes: (1) freshwater saturation of soils and flooding (e.g., from heavy precipitation) and (2) salinization from storm surge by saturating and flooding soils with brackish water. Here we describe the immediate effects of the experimental flooding treatments on hydrologic, biogeochemical and vegetation ecosystem components following the first novel experimental ecosystem-scale flooding event in TEMPEST. Following a 9-hour experimental treatment, the system's hydrology was temporarily and significantly impacted, but there were subtle effects on biogeochemical and vegetation components of the ecosystem. This suggests that this temperate deciduous forest was resistant to a single novel flooding event, even if the water is saline. Most biogeochemical parameters monitored in the soil, porewater, and groundwater responded similarly between freshwater and saltwater treatments relative to the control plot. However, we show that even a single episodic event can cause large transient shifts in belowground conditions that drive physiological changes in coastal forest functions, such as soil moisture and oxygen levels. Such responses may impact how the system responds to future perturbations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.