ArticlePloS one2026
COVID-19 pandemic stressors and their longer-term association with young people's wellbeing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a significant body of research on adolescent wellbeing during the pandemic but less attention to the pathways through which the pandemic might be driving longer-term impacts on wellbeing. This paper addresses this gap using prospective cohort data collected at three time-points (ages 9, 12, 13; n = 2404; 50% female; 12.3% migrant-background) in Ireland, a country with a protracted period of school closures. Data collected from mid-2021 to mid-2022 (the late- to post-pandemic period) are used to analyse whether disruption across key domains such as education, family and peer relations during the pandemic has longer-term associations with adolescent self-reported mental wellbeing, while adjusting for socioemotional wellbeing before and during the pandemic. Several stressors (e.g., health-anxiety, support for home learning), which predicted worse wellbeing during the pandemic, were not significantly associated with late-/post-pandemic wellbeing. However, adolescents who, at the height of the pandemic, experienced greater disruption to familial relations and peer social relations (especially among girls), household economic shocks, elevated screen-time use, and a lack of a quiet place to study, report worse longer-term wellbeing outcomes. Some of these longer-term associations emerge from their link with worse wellbeing reported during the pandemic, which, in turn, predicts poorer longer-term wellbeing. However, screen-time and economic shocks remain linked with poorer late-/post-pandemic wellbeing even after accounting for peri-pandemic wellbeing. The findings highlight how external shocks such as the pandemic appear to be experienced differently depending on the social and economic resources of young people and their families, and how these can potentially shape adolescents' wellbeing after the initial stressors have abated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.