Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42127016›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2026

Quantifying the role of contact sampling for poliovirus detection in Nigeria.

Julia Ledien, Tesfaye B Erbeto, Samuel O Okiror, Nicholas C Grassly, Isobel M Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia LedienMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6116-8371
Tesfaye B ErbetoWorld Health Organization African Regional Office, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo.
Samuel O OkirorGates Foundation, London, United Kingdom.
Nicholas C GrasslyMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Isobel M BlakeMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3977-1318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive poliovirus surveillance is critical during the polio endgame and relies on systematic testing of stool samples from reported acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases. Collecting stool samples from healthy close contacts of AFP cases, preferably contacts aged under 5 years, is a potential method for enhancing surveillance. The introduction of type 2 novel oral polio vaccine (nOPV2) in Nigeria from 2021 under Emergency Use Listing was accompanied by an unprecedented intensification of contact sampling, but it is unclear how this affected surveillance sensitivity. Here, we analysed data from 71,002 AFP cases and 51,100 associated contacts sampled in Nigeria between January 2017 and November 2023 to quantify the added value of contact sampling and assess how it can be optimised. A total of 600 serotype-2 vaccine-derived poliovirus AFP cases were reported, of which 123 (20.5%) were identified through the presence of the virus in the stool of their contacts ('false negative' cases). Boosted Regression Trees ensemble models were used to identify the factors associated with the probability of a type-2 vaccine-derived poliovirus-positive contact and for the AFP case to be a false negative. AFP cases and contacts had a higher chance of concordant type-2 vaccine-derived poliovirus test results when stools were collected within 5 days of paralysis onset, whilst false negative AFP cases were most likely 5-15 days after paralysis onset. Our results suggest that contact sampling enhances the sensitivity of poliovirus surveillance, especially for AFP cases with inadequate stool samples or with stool samples collected 5-15 days after the onset of paralysis.

Identifiers

PMID42127016
PMCPMC13170847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.