ArticlePloS one2026
Validation of deep learning enabled web based and smartphone optimized application RadAnalyzer to measure vertebral heart size and vertebral left atrial size in dogs.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObjective radiographic measures of heart size including vertebral heart size (VHS) and vertebral left atrial size (VLAS) are associated with inter and intra-observer variability when measured by humans. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools including RadAnalyzer are available to measure VHS and VLAS.
objectivesCompare VHS and VLAS measurements made by web based and smartphone optimized deep learning enabled program, RadAnalyzer, to a trained observer. ANIMALS: High-quality radiographs from 1058 client-owned dogs, across 80 breeds with a variety of heart sizes and thoracic confirmations.
methodsRetrospective, single center, method comparison study. Pearson's correlation, Bland-Altman plots and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement.
resultsRadAnalyzer measurements of VHS and VLAS correlated well with the human observer's modified measurements (r = 0.917 and r = 0.873 respectively) and had small mean biases (0.002 and 0.007 with limits of agreement of -0.85 to 0.85 and -0.44 to 0.46 vertebrae respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: RadAnalyzer had clinically insignificant magnitude differences in measurement of VHS and VLAS when compared to a human observer and can therefore be used to assist veterinarians with measuring VHS and VLAS on good quality right lateral radiographs in dogs of all sizes. Future studies comparing AI derived radiographic measures with echocardiographic measures of cardiac size are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.