Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126946›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Equitable Digital Frailty Screening for Marginalized Older Adults Using Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview: Collaborative Development Guide and User Testing Study.

Jane Ye In Hwang, Tony Butler, Peter Schofield, Rhys Mantell, Michael Kasumovic, Natasha Ginnivan, Kylie Radford, Ruth E Hubbard, Emily Gordon, Arthur Montalto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jane Ye In HwangSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Building C29 HTH Level 05, 55 Botany Street Randwick, UNSW, 2052, Australia, 61 93480073.ORCID 0000-0003-0142-3251
Tony ButlerSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Building C29 HTH Level 05, 55 Botany Street Randwick, UNSW, 2052, Australia, 61 93480073.ORCID 0000-0002-2679-2769
Peter SchofieldUniversity of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8298-8590
Rhys MantellSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Building C29 HTH Level 05, 55 Botany Street Randwick, UNSW, 2052, Australia, 61 93480073.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-1286
Michael KasumovicSchool of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, UNSW Sydney, UNSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0158-5517
Natasha GinnivanSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Building C29 HTH Level 05, 55 Botany Street Randwick, UNSW, 2052, Australia, 61 93480073.ORCID 0000-0002-8581-6812
Kylie RadfordNeuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8095-5314
Ruth E HubbardAustralian Frailty Network, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-5836
Emily GordonAustralian Frailty Network, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9985-6404
Arthur MontaltoSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Building C29 HTH Level 05, 55 Botany Street Randwick, UNSW, 2052, Australia, 61 93480073.ORCID 0000-0003-4906-1237
Phillip SnoymanNSW Department of Communities and Justice, Corrective Services NSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9266-1591
Adrienne WithallSchool of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, UNSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7079-465X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Older adults facing social or structural marginalization for reasons such as lower literacy, digital exclusion, financial constraints, restricted living environments, or complex health histories, face persistent barriers to much-needed health screening. Digital health tools, particularly those using audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) technology, offer potential to overcome these barriers (audio-delivered and self-administrable), but their application to marginalized populations remains underexplored. Moreover, guidance is limited for developing such tools which require collaboration within cross-disciplinary teams. This paper presents development insights and user testing findings from the ASCAPE (Audio App-Delivered Screening for Cognition and Age-Related Health in Prisoners) project, which aimed to develop equitable digital frailty and cognition screening for older people in Australian prisons. Objective: This study aims to describe the collaborative development of the "ASCAPE-HS" prototype, a tablet-based ACASI-delivered Frailty Index and aging screener, and to synthesize key lessons from the project that can inform equitable digital health tool development in hard-to-reach older adults. Also, to present findings on the usability and acceptability of ASCAPE-HS in a diverse community sample. Methods: The ASCAPE-HS prototype was developed through an iterative process involving researchers, clinicians, software developers, and end users under a digital health equity framework. The prototype included a self-administered, audio-delivered Frailty Index, alongside other items relevant to aging. The design process prioritized accessibility, sociocultural relevance, and technical feasibility, with regular multidisciplinary consultation and iterative refinement. Exploratory user testing with 20 older adults (aged 47-93 years, including n=5 who had not finished secondary schooling, n=3 people with previous imprisonment history, and n=9 with mild or moderate cognitive impairment) provided feedback on usability and acceptability. Results: A 50-item Frailty Index was developed, alongside an additional selection of holistic questions that could meaningfully capture age-related health, and transferred to an iOS app (Apple, Inc), with ACASI features. Key elements included lay wording, consistent interface, simple "tapping" response options with repeatable audio feedback, a tutorial, and artificial intelligence-generated audio guidance. Key development considerations were synthesized into a checklist for teams undertaking similar projects. Successful strategies for the collaborative design process included diverse teams abreast of emerging literature and policy with varying expectations for engagement during development, and dedicating time to flexible, iterative development processes. Acceptability (median scores ≥4 out of 5 across 6 constructs) and usability (mean System Usability Scale score 79.0, SD 8.8) were high. Conclusions: A collaborative approach can produce ACASI-based health screening tools that are well-received by older adults. We highlight the feasibility of integrating frailty and aging assessment into a usable and acceptable digital tool, and offer actionable principles for collaborative, evidence-based development of equitable health screening tools in diverse, hard-to-reach populations.

Indexed as

FrailtyGeriatric AssessmentMass ScreeningAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDigital HealthFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedco-designdigital healthfrailtyhealth equityhealth screeningmultidisciplinary

Identifiers

PMID42126946
PMCPMC13170664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.