Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126918›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of general virology2026

Virus taxonomy and the ICTV - 21 FAQs for the perplexed virologist.

Donald B Smith, Peter Simmonds, Stuart G Siddell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of general virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donald B SmithNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter SimmondsVirology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Stuart G SiddellSchool of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Just over 125 years has passed since the 'filterable' agents of tobacco mosaic disease and foot-and-mouth disease were first described as infectious, replicating entities smaller than bacteria. Today, viruses are formally classified into more than 16,000 species ranked into genera, families and higher taxa. The development of an official virus taxonomy has been overseen by an International Committee, first constituted in 1966 and renamed as the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) in 1975. Despite the engagement of the ICTV in virus taxonomy over the last 60 years, many aspects of virus classification and nomenclature may seem odd or sometimes incomprehensible to virologists more familiar with the taxonomy of cellular organisms. Who runs the ICTV? What are virus species demarcation criteria? Why have all virus species names become binomial? How can a sequence in a metagenomic dataset be assigned to a virus species? This article attempts to answer several such questions and outlines how a large, inclusive and global community of virologists has developed new and responsive policies for virus taxonomy in a decade when the pace of virus discovery has dramatically accelerated.

Indexed as

VirologyVirusesClassificationGenome, ViralTerminology as TopicInternational Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV)virus taxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42126918
PMCPMC13170759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.