Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126910›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias From Spontaneous Speech Using Foundation Speech and Language Models: Comparative Evaluation.

Jingyu Li, Lingchao Mao, Xi Mao, Hairong Wang, Zhendong Wang, Xuelei Sherry Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jingyu Li *H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8900-3528
Lingchao Mao *H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9550-2393
Xi Mao *Department of Economics, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-9135
Hairong WangOperations Research and Industrial Engineering, Cockrell School of Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-721X
Zhendong WangShandong Provincial Key Medical and Health Laboratory of Digital Psychiatry, Shandong Mental Health Center, Jinan, China.ORCID 0009-0008-8782-0162
Xuelei Sherry NiSchool of Data Science and Analytics, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0634-0025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are progressive neurodegenerative conditions where early detection is critical for timely intervention and care planning. However, current diagnostic methods are often inaccessible, costly, and delayed, especially for underserved populations. There is a growing need for scalable, noninvasive tools that can support timely diagnosis. Spontaneous speech contains rich acoustic and linguistic markers that can serve as noninvasive behavioral markers for cognitive decline. Foundation models, pretrained on large-scale audio or text data, generate high-dimensional embeddings that encode rich contextual and acoustic information.

objectiveThis study benchmarks open-source foundation language and speech models to evaluate their effectiveness in detecting ADRD from spontaneous speech as a potential solution for early, noninvasive, and scalable ADRD detection.

methodsIn this study, we used the Pioneering Research for Early Prediction of Alzheimer's and Related Dementias EUREKA (PREPARE) Challenge dataset, which consists of audio recordings from over 1600 participants with 3 distinct categories of cognitive decline: healthy control (HC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We further excluded samples that are non-English, nonspontaneous speech, or of poor quality. Our final samples included 703 (59.13%) HC, 81 (6.81%) MCI, and 405 (34.06%) AD cases. We systematically benchmarked 18 open-source foundation speech and language models to classify cognitive status into 3 categories (HC, MCI, or AD). Post hoc interpretability analysis was performed for the best-performing model using Shapley additive explanations linking high-dimensional embeddings with explainable acoustic and linguistic markers.

resultsWhisper-medium model achieved the highest performance among speech models at 0.731 accuracy and 0.802 area under the curve, while Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers with pause annotation achieved the top accuracy of 0.662 and 0.744 area under the curve among language models. Overall, ADRD detection based on state-of-the-art automatic speech recognition model-generated audio-embeddings outperformed other models, and the inclusion of nonsemantic information, such as pause patterns, consistently improved the classification performance of text-embedding-based models.

conclusionsOur work presents a comprehensive comparative evaluation of state-of-the-art speech and language models for AD and MCI detection on a large, clinically relevant dataset. Embeddings derived from acoustic models, which capture both semantic and acoustic information, show promising performance and highlight the potential for developing a more scalable, noninvasive, and cost-effective early detection tool for ADRD.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseEarly DiagnosisSpeechAgedCognitive DysfunctionFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleAlzheimer's diseaseclinical screeningcomparative evaluationdementia detectionfoundation speech modelslanguage modelsspeech biomarkersspontaneous speech analysis

Identifiers

PMID42126910
PMCPMC13216759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.