ArticleGigaScience2026
Accurate proteome-wide prediction of enzymes and catalytic sites using graph deep learning and protein language model.
Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the enzyme functions of proteins and their catalytic residues is vital to our understanding of diverse cellular processes. However, existing frameworks that can concurrently determine the enzymatic functions and active sites of proteins are scarce, and still have much room for improvement in prediction performance. In this study, we present EC-LMGraph, a protein language model- and graph convolutional network-based framework to predict enzyme commission (EC) numbers from protein sequence features and structures, and saliency mapping to score representative residues attribute to the enzymatic functions. EC-LMGraph attained an average F1 score of 0.77 in 3rd-level EC number prediction, and 0.76 in 4th-level prediction, outperforming numerous other algorithms that were either sequence-based only, or additionally incorporated structural information. Benchmarking on the Mechanism and Catalytic Site Atlas dataset and a set of Parkinson's disease-related proteins, we showed that EC-LMGraph showed a stronger emphasis on catalytic sites than the current state-of-the-art algorithm DeepFRI. Combining EC-LMGraph with AlphaFold2, our framework correctly determined the 3rd-level EC numbers of 229,160 proteins based purely on their predicted structures. We show that EC-LMGraph is capable of accurately predicting the 3rd/4th-level EC numbers, and pinpointing the key amino acid residues for many enzymes. EC-LMGraph is implemented and freely available at https://github.com/ngyuilun/EC-LMGraph.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.