ArticleJAMA network open2026
The California 2020 Medi-Cal Expansion to Young Adults and Coverage Among Noncitizens.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diabetes Medication Regimen Complexity and Glycemic Outcomes among Medically Underserved Latino Adults: Implications for Pharmacoequity.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Undocumented immigrants are more than 5 times as likely as US citizens to be uninsured. Before 2020, undocumented young adults aged 19 to 25 years in California were eligible for restricted-scope Medi-Cal, which only covers emergency services. Objective: To examine the association of the California 2020 full-scope Medi-Cal expansion to young adults aged 19 to 25 years regardless of immigration status with coverage outcomes and to assess subgroup differences by race and ethnicity, sex, and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross sectional study included American Community Survey respondents who were noncitizens aged 19 to 25 years before (2016-2019) and after (2021-2022) the policy's implementation in California; the treatment group was compared with California noncitizens aged 26 to 32 years and young adults aged 19 to 25 and 26 to 32 years from 6 comparison states (Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Nevada, New York, and Texas). Analysis was conducted from January 2024 to August 2025. Exposure: California's 2020 Medi-Cal expansion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Triple difference analysis was used to estimate the association of the California Medi-Cal expansion with health insurance coverage (any, Medicaid, and private coverage) among noncitizens aged 19 to 25 years relative to California noncitizens aged 26 to 32 years and young adults in the 6 comparison states. Results: The sample included 19 773 and 32 515 noncitizen American Community Survey respondents in California aged 19 to 25 years and 26 to 32 years, respectively, and 28 535 and 43 213 individuals aged 19 to 25 years and 26 to 32 years, respectively, residing in comparison states. Baseline weighted percentages for the 19- to 25-year treatment group included 52.1% (95% CI, 51.0%-53.2%) male, 31.9% (95% CI, 30.7%-33.0%) Asian non-Hispanic, 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5%-2.2%) Black non-Hispanic, 54.6% (95% CI, 53.4%-55.9%) Hispanic, 9.7% (95% CI, 8.9%-10.5%) White non-Hispanic, and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.6%-2.3%) other race non-Hispanic. Medi-Cal expansion was associated with a 4.2 (95% CI, 1.3-7.1)-percentage-point increase in Medicaid and a 3.5 (95% CI, 0.2-6.8)-percentage-point increase in any coverage. In subgroup analyses, percentage-point increases in Medicaid were statistically significant for Hispanic young adults (6.7 [95% CI, 2.6-10.9] percentage points), males (3.6 [95% CI, 0.1-7.1] percentage points), females (5.0 [95% CI, 0.7-9.3] percentage points), those aged 19 to 22 years (4.4 [95% CI, 0.7-8.1] percentage points), and those aged 23 to 25 years (4.0 [95% CI, 0.7-7.3] percentage points). In post hoc analyses, the estimates translated to increases in Medi-Cal and any coverage of 24.4 and 20.3 percentage points, or 30 665 and 25 554 young adults, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the California 2020 Medi-Cal expansion was associated with significant coverage gains. Because the American Community Survey did not distinguish between restricted- and full-scope Medi-Cal, the analysis may have underestimated coverage increases, and further research is warranted to understand the health care and economic costs and benefits of California's expansion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.