ReviewGeroScience2026
Bench to bedside: is rapamycin headed for the docTOR?
Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Almost a century ago, calorie restriction (CR) was identified as a robust intervention for extending lifespan and healthspan, a discovery that captured the imagination of both scientists and the public. If the powerful mechanisms engaged by CR can be uncovered and harnessed through a pill, humans might be able to live longer and healthier lives. Here, we will discuss the evolution of rapamycin, an inhibitor of the mTOR (mechanistic Target Of Rapamycin) protein kinase, from an immunosuppressant to the most reproducible pharmacological geroprotector in geroscience. This is a rapidly evolving field, with the number of basic science studies, clinical trials, and off-label use of mTOR inhibitors by the general public expanding quickly. We review findings in model organisms that have revealed potent benefits of rapamycin not only for longevity but for the function of multiple organ systems and on the hallmarks of aging. We review completed and ongoing clinical trials of rapamycin and analogs for diseases of aging in humans, and discuss the challenges and side-effects of rapamycin that may limit its translation from the laboratory to the clinic. While the jury is still out, we conclude that rapamycin-or molecules that similarly act to inhibit mTOR-may yet realize the century-old dream of extending healthspan and lifespan with a small molecule.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.