ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Sustained virological response improved survival outcomes after curative resection in patients with hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of direct‑acting antiviral therapy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimThe impact of sustained virological response (SVR) on outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing liver resection (LR) was assessed.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 344 patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC who underwent LR. Patients were divided into three groups: preoperatively achieving SVR (pre-SVR); postoperatively achieving SVR (post-SVR); and not achieving SVR (non-SVR).
results145 patients received direct-acting antivirals, 76 received interferon-based therapy, and 123 were untreated. 95 patients were pre-SVR, 87 were post-SVR, and 162 were non-SVR, including untreated patients. Five-year overall survival was 83% in the pre-SVR group, 92% in the post-SVR group, and 50% in the non-SVR group (p < 0.001). Pre-SVR (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.35; 95% CI 0.19-0.62; p < 0.001) and post-SVR (aHR 0.18; 95% CI 0.09-0.36; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of mortality. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 75% in the pre-SVR group, 55% in the post-SVR group, and 45% in the non-SVR group (p < 0.001). Pre-SVR (aHR 0.45; 95% CI 0.28-0.73; p = 0.001) was an independent predictor of recurrence, whereas post-SVR (aHR 0.84; 95% CI 0.57-1.24; p = 0.37) was not.
conclusionsAchieving SVR before or after LR decreased the mortality risk and achieving SVR before LR decreased the recurrence risk of patients with HCV-related HCC undergoing LR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42126785What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.