Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42126779›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026

Evaluation of anticoagulation management in patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia awaiting diagnosis confirmation.

Alyssa R George, Katelyn W Sylvester, Dareen M Kanaan, Delaney M Brooks, Kenneth E Lupi, Brian R Schuler, Jean M Connors

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alyssa R GeorgeDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA. ageorge8@hfhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6005-0738
Katelyn W SylvesterDepartment of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-2354
Dareen M KanaanDepartment of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-6689
Delaney M BrooksDepartment of Pharmacy, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-7885-4215
Kenneth E LupiDepartment of Pharmacy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-8048
Brian R SchulerDepartment of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7997-649X
Jean M ConnorsDepartment of Hematology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6445-582X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2018 American Society of Hematology (ASH) guidelines recommend discontinuation of heparin products upon suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and initiation of therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation. This practice may be influenced by various factors, including diagnostic method. Our institution recently switched from an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that was run once daily to a chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) that is run on-demand to detect anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin antibodies. The objective was to evaluate if implementation of an on-demand anti-PF4/heparin antibody CLIA assay changed the timing of initiating a non-heparin anticoagulant compared with the traditional ELISA assay. A retrospective analysis was performed at our single academic medical center. Eligible subjects included patients ordered for an ELISA or CLIA anti-PF4/heparin assay upon suspicion of HIT. The major endpoint was the percentage of patients transitioned to a therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulant at the time of testing. Minor endpoints included the development of new or worsening thrombosis and/or bleeding within 72 h of testing. Overall, 227 patients were included in the analysis (n = 123 (ELISA), n = 104 (CLIA)). Significantly fewer patients in the CLIA group were switched to non-heparin anticoagulation at the time of testing as compared to the ELISA group (10.4% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.006). There were no differences between groups for the development of the minor endpoints. Significantly fewer patients were switched to therapeutic non-heparin anticoagulation at the time of testing after converting to an on-demand anti-PF4/heparin antibody CLIA assay. These findings may aid in optimizing institutional guidelines.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsHeparinThrombocytopeniaAgedEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansLuminescent MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Factor 4Retrospective StudiesAnticoagulantsHeparinPF4 protein, humanPlatelet Factor 4AnticoagulationBleedingHeparinThrombocytopeniaThrombosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.